Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
$17M Jury Award Against American Family Mutual Reinstated
Midwest News May 6, 2009
A Missouri appeals court has reinstated a $17 million jury award in a class action lawsuit against American Family Mutual Insurance Co. over aftermarket vehicle parts.
The Missouri Court of ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: wow, actually proud of my employer! | Dave | Oct 26, 2009, 1:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 12, 2009, 9:17 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | hollywood | May 11, 2009, 9:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 11, 2009, 2:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Defender of Justice | May 11, 2009, 2:25 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | hollywood | May 11, 2009, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 11, 2009, 1:15 pm |
| Hollywood | Ray | May 11, 2009, 12:21 pm |
| RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Hollywood | May 11, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| wow, actually proud of my employer! | shaking my head | May 11, 2009, 10:58 am |
| RE: Could we try to be a little more professional here? | Defender of Justice | May 7, 2009, 2:10 pm |
| Could we try to be a little more professional here? | fighting saints | May 6, 2009, 11:03 pm |
| RE: RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 9:27 pm |
| RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 9:16 pm |
| RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill | Silly Boy | May 6, 2009, 9:01 pm |
| RE: Wait wait - Gill | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 7:36 pm |
| Wait wait - Gill | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 7:10 pm |
| RE: simple solution | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 6:50 pm |
| RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 5:54 pm |
| RE: simple solution | J Armstead | May 6, 2009, 5:33 pm |
| simple solution | caveat emptor | May 6, 2009, 5:02 pm |
| No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 5:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 4:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 4:43 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 4:38 pm |
| RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 4:23 pm |
| You are correct Curious... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 4:05 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket vs. OEM | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 3:47 pm |
| RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 3:44 pm |
| total cost of a car using oem | curious george | May 6, 2009, 3:41 pm |
| Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 3:38 pm |
| Aftermarket vs. OEM | Ray | May 6, 2009, 3:30 pm |
| RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 3:29 pm |
| RE: RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | J Armstead | May 6, 2009, 3:23 pm |
| RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Scot Strong | May 6, 2009, 3:07 pm |
| To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 2:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 2:46 pm |
| Aftermarket Parts | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 1:59 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket Parts | No SF Fan | May 6, 2009, 1:46 pm |
| RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts | Ray | May 6, 2009, 1:40 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket Parts | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 1:07 pm |
| Aftermarket Parts | MIKE MATTSON | May 6, 2009, 12:43 pm |
| precedence | curious george | May 6, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert
Since it appears you don't know how to work Google - Perhaps this will help.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Wade+Ebert+American+Auto+Body&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
Many things for you to read there. I also encourage you to hire an attorney with whom you can consult and to read your state laws. Beyond that - To perhaps take a business law class, if not that, a real estate qualification test - that experiance will teach you an awful lot about "duty" to the consumer and basic "tort" and "contract" law.
I got most of my experience with the legal aspects of our industry by studying under an attorney (Patrick J. McGuire) who, on retainer provided monthly curricula and review for groups of repairers in our state.
I also was involved in my Father's successful litigation against State Farm insurance when he owned the shop. During and after that I was an expert witness in several aftermarket parts and diminished value cases.
I currently provide investigative services for attorneys amassing data regarding damage analysis and poor repairs.
I have worked directly with the Office of the Attorney General in our state on legislation written mostly by Mr. Pierson that was passed into law - and continue to work for enforcement of the consumer protection elements of same.
I have testified before several committees in both the House and Senate Chambers.
I am currently and have in the past, been consulted independently by several states' associations on matters of legislation and regulation.
I recently worked with OH attorney Erica Eversman in the development of the Model Code of Ethics which has been released to all state associations for implementation in their states.
There has always been a vacuum in this industry - which the lowest common denomiator has rushed in to fill. It is time we elevated the LCD.
I think if you would read more industry centric magazines and perhaps participate in an association you would be amazed at just how many people have (finally) come to know what I do.
I know I work for the Vehicle Owner.
I know the Attorney General knows I do too.
I know that "claims handling", "negotiating", and "representation" are not what I or anyone else can do legally - unless they are an attorney. I know what insurers do does not really concern me or how I repair the car - since I don't work for them.
I know the understanding of these concepts seems completely foreign and uncomfortable and I know the understanding took years to soak in. Now I get calls from attorneys to help them understand - and I know I've done it right when they call me back and say something like "You know? You are right - the way things have been influenced by insurers, I just haven't thought about it that way since they let me out of law school."
Read something and contact me with any questions you may have. Maybe you'll find what others have - a new way to look at an old business.
If you are near and want to pick my brain in public - I've been invited and I'll be speaking to a group of repairers on the IL side of the river just northeast of Saint Louis tomorrow night.