Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
S.D. Company Liable for Accident Caused by Drunk Underage Worker
Midwest News • July 1, 2009
The South Dakota Supreme Court has ruled that if an employer provides an underage employee with unfettered access to alcoholic beverages, that employer is liable for any damage that occurs as a ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: Drunk Underage Worker | Ratemaker | Jul 2, 2009, 9:03 am |
| RE: Drunk Underage Worker | Old Guy | Jul 2, 2009, 7:53 am |
| Who's shifting ? | Sue | Jul 1, 2009, 4:33 pm |
| RE: Couldn't disagree more | Just Bob | Jul 1, 2009, 4:27 pm |
| I can foresee.. | caffiend | Jul 1, 2009, 3:31 pm |
| RE: RE: Couldn't disagree more | Jimmy | Jul 1, 2009, 2:37 pm |
| RE: Couldn't agree more | Safety Guy | Jul 1, 2009, 1:39 pm |
| Couldn't agree more | Sue Falls | Jul 1, 2009, 1:30 pm |
| RE: Couldn't disagree more | Safety Guy | Jul 1, 2009, 1:26 pm |
| Couldn't disagree more | Jimmy | Jul 1, 2009, 12:59 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: Couldn't disagree more
This individual was an adult (20 years of age) and should have followed the law (under the legal age to consume alcohol), and the company policy of not consuming alcohol while working.
The Circut Court got it right.
As for Ms. McGuire, she has every right to go after Curry and get her just due.