Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
S.D. Company Liable for Accident Caused by Drunk Underage Worker
Midwest News • July 1, 2009
The South Dakota Supreme Court has ruled that if an employer provides an underage employee with unfettered access to alcoholic beverages, that employer is liable for any damage that occurs as a ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: Drunk Underage Worker | Ratemaker | Jul 2, 2009, 9:03 am |
| RE: Drunk Underage Worker | Old Guy | Jul 2, 2009, 7:53 am |
| Who's shifting ? | Sue | Jul 1, 2009, 4:33 pm |
| RE: Couldn't disagree more | Just Bob | Jul 1, 2009, 4:27 pm |
| I can foresee.. | caffiend | Jul 1, 2009, 3:31 pm |
| RE: RE: Couldn't disagree more | Jimmy | Jul 1, 2009, 2:37 pm |
| RE: Couldn't agree more | Safety Guy | Jul 1, 2009, 1:39 pm |
| Couldn't agree more | Sue Falls | Jul 1, 2009, 1:30 pm |
| RE: Couldn't disagree more | Safety Guy | Jul 1, 2009, 1:26 pm |
| Couldn't disagree more | Jimmy | Jul 1, 2009, 12:59 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: Couldn't disagree more
NOT forseeable ? ! until I read the rest of the post I thought this was supposed to be taken sarcastically. Read that again suppose the situation and you want to say WTH did you think would happen !