National News

Viewing comments for:

Jury Renders Partial Verdict in WTC Recovery Case

National News • April 30, 2004
The federal jury that has been deliberating the complex issue of how much Silverstein Properties, the master leaseholder of the World Trade Center, should recover from its insurers has reached a ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: WTC Trial Verdict

Posted On: April 30, 2004, 12:36 pm CDT
Posted By: Akos Swierkiewicz
Comment:
It appears that there is a misunderstanding by both RD Hood and Mark H. Denman regarding the purpose of the trial. It was not about whether the tragic event on 9/11 was one or two occurrence. The issue before the jury was whether the insurers were bound by the WilProp form or the Travelers form. The partial verdict that was announced yesterday, was in favor of the insurers who contended that the WilProp form applied, which has a definition of occurrence and another court already ruled that under the WilProp form there was one occurrence.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: WTC Linda
May 6, 2004, 6:42 am
RE: RE: WTC J. Auxier
May 3, 2004, 10:02 am
WTC ... Carrier Senior Management RAC
May 3, 2004, 7:19 am
WTC Underinsurance Narinder Kabul
May 1, 2004, 2:55 pm
RE: RE: WTC Ken
Apr 30, 2004, 3:31 pm
WTC Jere F. Allan
Apr 30, 2004, 3:23 pm
RE: WTC Smitty
Apr 30, 2004, 3:11 pm
RE: WTC Trial Verdict mike mattison
Apr 30, 2004, 1:40 pm
WTC Underinsurance John Fortman
Apr 30, 2004, 1:37 pm
WTC Trial Verdict Akos Swierkiewicz
Apr 30, 2004, 12:36 pm
RE: WTC RD Hood
Apr 30, 2004, 12:22 pm
WTC mark h denman
Apr 30, 2004, 11:36 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.