National News
Viewing comments for:
Jury Rules WTC Attacks Were Two Events; Silverstein Recovery May Double to $2.2 Billion
National News • December 7, 2004
The second of three scheduled trials to determine the amount of the recovery for the destruction of the World Trade Center's twin towers ended in a victory for master lease holder Silverstein ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| phentermine 30 mg 1 | phentermine 30 mg 1 | Nov 25, 2009, 1:52 am |
| RE: Larry Silverstein Should Be Arrested For Insurance Fraud | mike reis | Jan 17, 2009, 1:51 am |
| Larry Silverstein Should Be Arrested For Insurance Fraud | John | Feb 6, 2005, 1:51 pm |
| Larry Silverstein Should Be Arrested For Insurance Fraud | Anonymous American Citizen | Feb 5, 2005, 11:01 pm |
| Age Old Broker needs a straight jacket. | Big Insurance | Dec 17, 2004, 5:08 pm |
| WTC Coverage | Frank Cluney | Dec 15, 2004, 3:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: What was the value of each building ? | Age Old Ins Broker From NY | Dec 15, 2004, 3:33 pm |
| RE: RE: What was the value of each building ? | Mark | Dec 15, 2004, 12:20 pm |
| Smitty is Right! | Mark | Dec 15, 2004, 12:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks | Tommy | Dec 15, 2004, 7:47 am |
| RE: What was the value of each building ? | bubba | Dec 14, 2004, 3:10 pm |
| What was the value of each building ? | Young broker | Dec 14, 2004, 3:00 pm |
| RE: attacks | steve | Dec 9, 2004, 5:53 pm |
| attacks | john | Dec 9, 2004, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks | Big Insurance | Dec 9, 2004, 3:29 pm |
| WTC Coverage | Frank Cluney | Dec 8, 2004, 2:01 pm |
| RE: WTC Attack(s) | D.V. | Dec 8, 2004, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: yada, yada, yada... | Mark | Dec 8, 2004, 12:14 pm |
| RE: RE: yada, yada, yada... | Nuke | Dec 8, 2004, 12:08 pm |
| RE: RE: Yet another old | Bill D | Dec 8, 2004, 9:20 am |
| RE: Yet another old "property" broker's input | JTM | Dec 7, 2004, 5:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy | GLENN PARMLEY | Dec 7, 2004, 5:10 pm |
| Ah Franks got it | John | Dec 7, 2004, 4:02 pm |
| RE: RE: Limits | frank cluney | Dec 7, 2004, 3:07 pm |
| RE: RE: Limits | san | Dec 7, 2004, 2:58 pm |
| RE: Limits | T | Dec 7, 2004, 2:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: attacks | INSchic | Dec 7, 2004, 2:42 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy | another old broker from NY | Dec 7, 2004, 2:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy | another old broker from NY | Dec 7, 2004, 2:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy | Age Old Ins Broker From NY | Dec 7, 2004, 2:15 pm |
| RE: attacks | sandi | Dec 7, 2004, 2:12 pm |
| RE: RE: attacks | Dan | Dec 7, 2004, 1:59 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks | tommy | Dec 7, 2004, 1:54 pm |
| attacks | Kathi | Dec 7, 2004, 1:54 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: attacks | Smitty | Dec 7, 2004, 1:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks | Jere Allan | Dec 7, 2004, 1:40 pm |
| One plus one equals two | inmyhumbleopinion | Dec 7, 2004, 1:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: attacks | Jon | Dec 7, 2004, 1:09 pm |
| RE: attacks | Smitty | Dec 7, 2004, 1:08 pm |
| RE: RE: attacks | Big Insurance | Dec 7, 2004, 12:57 pm |
| RE: attacks | Sharon | Dec 7, 2004, 12:49 pm |
| RE: attacks | BUBBA | Dec 7, 2004, 12:46 pm |
| attacks | Kristy Hodik | Dec 7, 2004, 10:05 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks
One for one tower, one for the other, one for the Pentagon and one assumed for the White House that crashed in the woodlands.
By some of your reasoning, all of these would have been one event, just different targets. Each of the towers was a separate target just as the Pentagon and White House were, thus two separate claims. However, I don't believe this is the arguement, it appears to be the wording of the different policy forms that is making the difference as to whether there is one or two claims.