National News

Viewing comments for:

Jury Rules WTC Attacks Were Two Events; Silverstein Recovery May Double to $2.2 Billion

National News • December 7, 2004
The second of three scheduled trials to determine the amount of the recovery for the destruction of the World Trade Center's twin towers ended in a victory for master lease holder Silverstein ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy

Posted On: December 7, 2004, 2:33 pm CST
Posted By: another old broker from NY
Comment:
Dear fellow old broker,

Stow the politics. Bush won.
Each plane was an occurrence as was so well described by someone else's comment. If a barn in a field was set on fire by one,two or more people it is one occurrence.Each arsonist in not a seperate cause of loss.If they then set afire the nearby barn it would be
a seperate occurrence.Willis may have a legal problem if Silverstein sues them for using their form if it can be shown not to have been fully explained to them and accepted.

Another old broker.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Larry Silverstein Should Be Arrested For Insurance Fraud mike reis
Jan 17, 2009, 1:51 am
Larry Silverstein Should Be Arrested For Insurance Fraud John
Feb 6, 2005, 1:51 pm
Larry Silverstein Should Be Arrested For Insurance Fraud Anonymous American Citizen
Feb 5, 2005, 11:01 pm
Age Old Broker needs a straight jacket. Big Insurance
Dec 17, 2004, 5:08 pm
WTC Coverage Frank Cluney
Dec 15, 2004, 3:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: What was the value of each building ? Age Old Ins Broker From NY
Dec 15, 2004, 3:33 pm
RE: RE: What was the value of each building ? Mark
Dec 15, 2004, 12:20 pm
Smitty is Right! Mark
Dec 15, 2004, 12:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks Tommy
Dec 15, 2004, 7:47 am
RE: What was the value of each building ? bubba
Dec 14, 2004, 3:10 pm
What was the value of each building ? Young broker
Dec 14, 2004, 3:00 pm
RE: attacks steve
Dec 9, 2004, 5:53 pm
attacks john
Dec 9, 2004, 4:07 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks Big Insurance
Dec 9, 2004, 3:29 pm
WTC Coverage Frank Cluney
Dec 8, 2004, 2:01 pm
RE: WTC Attack(s) D.V.
Dec 8, 2004, 12:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: yada, yada, yada... Mark
Dec 8, 2004, 12:14 pm
RE: RE: yada, yada, yada... Nuke
Dec 8, 2004, 12:08 pm
RE: RE: Yet another old Bill D
Dec 8, 2004, 9:20 am
RE: Yet another old "property" broker's input JTM
Dec 7, 2004, 5:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy GLENN PARMLEY
Dec 7, 2004, 5:10 pm
Ah Franks got it John
Dec 7, 2004, 4:02 pm
RE: RE: Limits frank cluney
Dec 7, 2004, 3:07 pm
RE: RE: Limits san
Dec 7, 2004, 2:58 pm
RE: Limits T
Dec 7, 2004, 2:47 pm
RE: RE: RE: attacks INSchic
Dec 7, 2004, 2:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy another old broker from NY
Dec 7, 2004, 2:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy another old broker from NY
Dec 7, 2004, 2:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: attack Conspiracy Age Old Ins Broker From NY
Dec 7, 2004, 2:15 pm
RE: attacks sandi
Dec 7, 2004, 2:12 pm
RE: RE: attacks Dan
Dec 7, 2004, 1:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks tommy
Dec 7, 2004, 1:54 pm
attacks Kathi
Dec 7, 2004, 1:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: attacks Smitty
Dec 7, 2004, 1:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: attacks Jere Allan
Dec 7, 2004, 1:40 pm
One plus one equals two inmyhumbleopinion
Dec 7, 2004, 1:39 pm
RE: RE: RE: attacks Jon
Dec 7, 2004, 1:09 pm
RE: attacks Smitty
Dec 7, 2004, 1:08 pm
RE: RE: attacks Big Insurance
Dec 7, 2004, 12:57 pm
RE: attacks Sharon
Dec 7, 2004, 12:49 pm
RE: attacks BUBBA
Dec 7, 2004, 12:46 pm
attacks Kristy Hodik
Dec 7, 2004, 10:05 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.