Posted On: December 7, 2004, 4:02 pm CST

Posted By: John

Frank seems to have said it better than any so far. Even the people in this forum are letting emotion cloud their opinion. It does not matter if all 4 planes were headed to the WTC. If the policy form used defines an event, then coverage is based on an event, if it fails to define "an event" than you can argue for 2. This coverage issue far exceeds what most agents have ever seen and unless you know more specifics than the public has heard, you are probably spouting thought and opinion. It is clear that the WTC attack was 1 planned attack, carried out by multiple terrorists with multiple weapons. Here is a thought, if the Government insured both the Pentagon and the White House under a common policy and both buildings had been hit, would it be 1 event or 2? If you have already answered you are a fool, because you don't know what the policy form said.