National News
Viewing comments for:
Feinstein to Retire; Farmers Appoints Hopkins CEO
National News • December 14, 2004
An announcement from Zurich Financial Services Group notes that Martin D. Feinstein (56) will retire effective March 31, 2005, as CEO of Farmers Group Inc. (FGI). He will also step down from his ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| followup | former agent | Oct 2, 2008, 3:57 pm |
| RE: Homeless | Soraya Deen | Dec 8, 2005, 2:31 am |
| RE: Marty's earnings | Farmers spirals downward | Apr 20, 2005, 6:17 pm |
| earnings | mary williams | Apr 20, 2005, 4:02 pm |
| RE: RE: Best news yet | Pinaka Maganda | Mar 7, 2005, 5:04 pm |
| New Era? | Illinois Agent | Jan 2, 2005, 10:07 pm |
| Thanks for nothing Marty | Blake | Dec 29, 2004, 8:32 pm |
| RE: Perfect Timing Mr Feinstein | Joe Agent | Dec 29, 2004, 1:26 pm |
| Consumer Reports September 2004 rates Farmers LAST | Farmers SCREWED me too! | Dec 27, 2004, 10:12 pm |
| Marty bails as Farmers continues market free-fall | Joe DM | Dec 27, 2004, 3:50 pm |
| Farmers...one of the great American success stories! | Former agent in MI | Dec 22, 2004, 8:59 am |
| RE: Typical | Tom | Dec 21, 2004, 4:51 pm |
| RE: Typical | Tom | Dec 21, 2004, 4:50 pm |
| RE: Typical | Tom | Dec 21, 2004, 4:50 pm |
| Typical | Scott | Dec 21, 2004, 4:43 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Marty and Paul | Henry 19yr agent | Dec 21, 2004, 3:55 pm |
| RE: RE: Marty and Paul | Debbie | Dec 21, 2004, 3:21 pm |
| RE: Marty and Paul | Dave | Dec 21, 2004, 11:17 am |
| Marty and Paul | Jim Mulligan | Dec 21, 2004, 10:52 am |
| TIME WILL TELL! | Mike | Dec 20, 2004, 5:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Finally... | another Farmers alum | Dec 20, 2004, 5:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Finally... | Succesful independent agent | Dec 20, 2004, 3:54 pm |
| Perfect Timing Mr Feinstein | Even | Dec 20, 2004, 1:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss the po | Paul 25yr's | Dec 20, 2004, 9:42 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both mis | Tom | Dec 17, 2004, 3:29 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss th | zack | Dec 17, 2004, 3:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss the po | Tom | Dec 17, 2004, 2:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss the point | zack | Dec 17, 2004, 2:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss the point | Get A Clue Management | Dec 17, 2004, 2:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss the point | zack | Dec 17, 2004, 1:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss the point | Bill | Dec 17, 2004, 12:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss the point | zack | Dec 17, 2004, 12:32 pm |
| RE: RE: John & Zack Both miss the point | Tom | Dec 17, 2004, 12:19 pm |
| RE: John & Zack Both miss the point | Zack | Dec 17, 2004, 12:05 pm |
| John & Zack Both miss the point | Tom | Dec 17, 2004, 10:55 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Zack Misses The Point (P.s) | Zack | Dec 17, 2004, 10:08 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Zack Misses The Point (P.s) | John | Dec 17, 2004, 9:17 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Zack Misses The Point P.s | John | Dec 17, 2004, 9:15 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Zack Misses The Point | John | Dec 16, 2004, 6:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Zack Misses The Point | zack | Dec 16, 2004, 6:05 pm |
| RE: RE: Zack Misses The Point | John | Dec 16, 2004, 5:23 pm |
| RE: Zack Misses The Point | zack | Dec 16, 2004, 5:00 pm |
| Zack Misses The Point | John | Dec 16, 2004, 4:51 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Best news yet | Tom | Dec 16, 2004, 4:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Best news yet | zack | Dec 16, 2004, 4:40 pm |
| RE: RE: Best news yet | Tom | Dec 16, 2004, 4:32 pm |
| RE: Best news yet | zack | Dec 16, 2004, 4:26 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Finally... | Tom | Dec 16, 2004, 4:16 pm |
| Best news yet | Bob | Dec 16, 2004, 4:03 pm |
| RE: RE: why | Dave 16yr agent | Dec 16, 2004, 3:31 pm |
| RE: why | Zack | Dec 16, 2004, 3:21 pm |
| RE: RE: Finally... | Nearly Former Agent | Dec 16, 2004, 2:33 pm |
| RE: Finally... | Dave 16yr agent | Dec 16, 2004, 1:38 pm |
| Finally... | Former Farmers Agent | Dec 16, 2004, 9:06 am |
| why | Fred Fieglestien | Dec 15, 2004, 4:42 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Zack Misses The Point (P.s)
I for got to mention that although we have a good life product so does everyone else, oh, and guess what there rates are usually 30% at least lower then our's, not to mention they paid a better commisssion. And would it not help if the life insurance contracts were part of the agents contract value ?
I just cant see how the two sides (Agency Force vs Company Management ) views are so apart, may be this should tell you guys something, after all isnt the job of management to pull the the team togethere? and if the current management team can not do this part of there job then maybe its time for a change.