National News

Viewing comments for:

Impact of Conn. Franchise Ruling May Not Be as Big on Insurance Agents as Claimed

National News • January 10, 2005
A recent $2.3 million jury verdict for wrongful termination in favor of a former Nationwide Insurance contract agent from Connecticut is unlikely to have any effect on independent agents or their ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Franchise ruling ,no mention of State Farm

Posted On: January 10, 2005, 4:42 pm CST
Posted By: Rich Pyorre
Comment:
It is interesting to note that State Farm was not even mentioned in this article when they probably have the most agents effected by it. There is currently litigation by State Farm agents with State Farm over this very subject. In this litigation with State Farm there has again been testimony by State Farm Executives contradicting what they have previously testified to. Does this suprise anyone? Rich Pyorre
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Franchise ruling ,no mention of State Farm Carl F. Worden
Feb 2, 2005, 5:07 pm
RE: Franchise ruling ,no mention of State Farm Mark
Jan 10, 2005, 9:18 pm
Franchise ruling ,no mention of State Farm Rich Pyorre
Jan 10, 2005, 4:42 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.