Home > Talkback
National News

Viewing comments for:

Turning Politics into Green for Favored 'Blue' Insurers

National News • April 28, 2005
A San Francisco-based nonprofit group that wants more consumers to support businesses that back liberal and "blue" state politics has added Progressive Insurance Co. to its preferred providers ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Blue People are sad sad sad

Posted On: April 28, 2005, 5:26 pm CDT
Posted By: DW
Comment:
It is stuff like this website that shows your ignorance and lack of compromise and understanding. You proclaim to be the party of the working people but you are all about taking from some to give to yours. Its funny how most of your blue leaders are elitist rich people who are so out of touch with reality they could not hope to understand how their political ideas put a tax burden on those who actually work for a living. I will not partake in purchasing my insurance from red or blue. Why would anyone support a company that waistes their premium dollars supporting a political party? I will place my trust in my agent and companies that spend money to better my insurance not on companies who spend my premium dollars on the owners or executive's political motives.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: Blue company label Rhiannon
Feb 13, 2008, 11:52 am
ccdkc@yahoo.com ccdkc@yahoo.com
Jun 4, 2006, 5:43 am
I smell fear rabbit. mike B
May 30, 2005, 11:26 am
gridlock ross perot
May 9, 2005, 2:40 pm
Red, Blue and Brown - For B.S.! Jacqueline Homan
May 4, 2005, 8:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: Workers' rights, eh? Jacqueline Homan
May 4, 2005, 7:35 pm
RE: Hilarious CA Joe
May 3, 2005, 4:18 pm
Hilarious Joe
May 3, 2005, 2:06 pm
RE: RE: Workers' rights, eh? CA Joe
May 3, 2005, 12:04 pm
RE: Workers' rights, eh? Jacqueline Homan
May 3, 2005, 8:02 am
RE: Wake up folks CA Joe
May 2, 2005, 4:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Red Ned
May 2, 2005, 4:01 pm
Workers' rights, eh? Paco the Poltergeist
May 2, 2005, 3:59 pm
Red & Blue Crap Jack J Maniscalco
May 2, 2005, 3:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pete
Apr 30, 2005, 8:27 am
RE: Before you boycott... Bob
Apr 29, 2005, 5:58 pm
Before you boycott... Smurfette
Apr 29, 2005, 3:43 pm
RE: This is great Allen R Hase
Apr 29, 2005, 2:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Betsy
Apr 29, 2005, 8:30 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Red Ned
Apr 29, 2005, 7:51 am
RE: Blue company label Joe Banks
Apr 28, 2005, 8:39 pm
Spitzer Funny ain't it?
Apr 28, 2005, 8:24 pm
BLUE V RED JR
Apr 28, 2005, 7:50 pm
RE: RE: Blue People are sad sad sad kabloey
Apr 28, 2005, 6:35 pm
RE: Blue People are sad sad sad
Apr 28, 2005, 6:00 pm
RE: Blue People are sad sad sad not Sad, unselfish...
Apr 28, 2005, 5:53 pm
Blue People are sad sad sad DW
Apr 28, 2005, 5:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I luv Pete
Apr 28, 2005, 5:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Pete
Apr 28, 2005, 5:11 pm
What? RJ
Apr 28, 2005, 4:45 pm
In Search of Leonard Nimoy
Apr 28, 2005, 4:30 pm
RE: RE: RE:
Apr 28, 2005, 4:28 pm
RE: RE:
Apr 28, 2005, 4:27 pm
RE: RE: Survivor
Apr 28, 2005, 4:26 pm
RE:
Apr 28, 2005, 4:25 pm
RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Smurfette
Apr 28, 2005, 4:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Red Ned
Apr 28, 2005, 4:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos agent007
Apr 28, 2005, 3:47 pm
Red Cos. Mr. Red
Apr 28, 2005, 3:31 pm
"BLUE" companies al alexander
Apr 28, 2005, 2:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Maximum
Apr 28, 2005, 2:35 pm
RE: Mr. Bootlegger Aristotle
Apr 28, 2005, 1:48 pm
Blue company label Murray
Apr 28, 2005, 1:45 pm
Mr. Bootlegger Mr. Blue
Apr 28, 2005, 1:25 pm
Red Vs Blue Wacko
Apr 28, 2005, 1:25 pm
RE: Red v Blue Cos ERIC
Apr 28, 2005, 1:07 pm
This is great Bootlegger
Apr 28, 2005, 1:00 pm
This is great Bootlegger
Apr 28, 2005, 1:00 pm
RE: This is great Red Ed
Apr 28, 2005, 12:50 pm
This is great Blue Boy
Apr 28, 2005, 12:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Blue Lou
Apr 28, 2005, 12:42 pm
RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Red Ed
Apr 28, 2005, 12:08 pm
RE: Red v Blue Cos locke
Apr 28, 2005, 12:04 pm
Red v Blue Cos Red Ed
Apr 28, 2005, 11:43 am
RED vs. BLUE Companies Beatrice Promoto
Apr 28, 2005, 9:47 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.