National News

Viewing comments for:

Turning Politics into Green for Favored 'Blue' Insurers

National News • April 28, 2005
A San Francisco-based nonprofit group that wants more consumers to support businesses that back liberal and "blue" state politics has added Progressive Insurance Co. to its preferred providers ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: Workers' rights, eh?

Posted On: May 4, 2005, 7:35 pm CDT
Posted By: Jacqueline Homan
Comment:
Hi CA Joe: The point I was trying to make was the sheer utter hypocrisy of ANY insurer touting itself as "blue" in promoting workers' rights, etc when no matter WHOM you are selling for, you do NOT get the benefit of any of FDR's New Deal programs that protect workers such as a minimum wage or overtime pay which virutally every other worker gets in this country - even if they have little to no education or do not have to get costly licenses in order to qualify for their careers. My point is that the so-called "blue" companies ought to set the example by putting their money where their big fat mouths are - by paying agents and brokers a base pay for their time, responsibilities and knowledge, and we all put in far more than 40 hours a week working to sell their products. As to the advice regarding getting into P&C as opposed to starving in the L,A&H end - I am doing that now - but I had to sneak in under the radar as an independent agent & broker starting out with one direct appointment from a sub-standard auto & home insurance carrier and the other P&C stuff as a sub-broker (where I own the book of business but get shafted on the compensation), because hardly anyone wanted to be the first to give me a chance and appoint me as a newbie, so I am in the "paying my dues" phase right now. When I got my P&C license (passed on first try) back in January, captive agent opportunities in my region with ANY company were being denied to anyone who wasn't a rich or upper middle-class young, white male. Administrative Assistant/secretary positions in established agencies were also not forthcoming for me because agents prefer to hire pretty, thin young Barbie Dolls over plump middle-aged women so that opportunity was also not available to me. State Farm, Liberty Mutual, Allstate and Nationwide are the captive insurance firms in my region and they all deny agent opportunities to those who are not well-to-do, young, white males which is why I despise the total hypocrisy of the whole "red/blue" categorization of insurers because even the "bluest" of the so-called "blue" companies discriminate against hiring/appointing middle-aged women as agents and anyone else who isn't well-off but who has the ambition, drive and brains to succeed - if only given a chance to do so. Thus, I offer the insurance I have access to markets for, and of those, I select what company's product will be a good fit for the insured based on their needs - not whether the carrier is a "red" or "blue" company.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: Blue company label Rhiannon
Feb 13, 2008, 11:52 am
ccdkc@yahoo.com ccdkc@yahoo.com
Jun 4, 2006, 5:43 am
I smell fear rabbit. mike B
May 30, 2005, 11:26 am
gridlock ross perot
May 9, 2005, 2:40 pm
Red, Blue and Brown - For B.S.! Jacqueline Homan
May 4, 2005, 8:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: Workers' rights, eh? Jacqueline Homan
May 4, 2005, 7:35 pm
RE: Hilarious CA Joe
May 3, 2005, 4:18 pm
Hilarious Joe
May 3, 2005, 2:06 pm
RE: RE: Workers' rights, eh? CA Joe
May 3, 2005, 12:04 pm
RE: Workers' rights, eh? Jacqueline Homan
May 3, 2005, 8:02 am
RE: Wake up folks CA Joe
May 2, 2005, 4:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Red Ned
May 2, 2005, 4:01 pm
Workers' rights, eh? Paco the Poltergeist
May 2, 2005, 3:59 pm
Red & Blue Crap Jack J Maniscalco
May 2, 2005, 3:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pete
Apr 30, 2005, 8:27 am
RE: Before you boycott... Bob
Apr 29, 2005, 5:58 pm
Before you boycott... Smurfette
Apr 29, 2005, 3:43 pm
RE: This is great Allen R Hase
Apr 29, 2005, 2:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Betsy
Apr 29, 2005, 8:30 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Red Ned
Apr 29, 2005, 7:51 am
RE: Blue company label Joe Banks
Apr 28, 2005, 8:39 pm
Spitzer Funny ain't it?
Apr 28, 2005, 8:24 pm
BLUE V RED JR
Apr 28, 2005, 7:50 pm
RE: RE: Blue People are sad sad sad kabloey
Apr 28, 2005, 6:35 pm
RE: Blue People are sad sad sad
Apr 28, 2005, 6:00 pm
RE: Blue People are sad sad sad not Sad, unselfish...
Apr 28, 2005, 5:53 pm
Blue People are sad sad sad DW
Apr 28, 2005, 5:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I luv Pete
Apr 28, 2005, 5:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Pete
Apr 28, 2005, 5:11 pm
What? RJ
Apr 28, 2005, 4:45 pm
In Search of Leonard Nimoy
Apr 28, 2005, 4:30 pm
RE: RE: RE:
Apr 28, 2005, 4:28 pm
RE: RE:
Apr 28, 2005, 4:27 pm
RE: RE: Survivor
Apr 28, 2005, 4:26 pm
RE:
Apr 28, 2005, 4:25 pm
RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Smurfette
Apr 28, 2005, 4:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Red Ned
Apr 28, 2005, 4:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos agent007
Apr 28, 2005, 3:47 pm
Red Cos. Mr. Red
Apr 28, 2005, 3:31 pm
"BLUE" companies al alexander
Apr 28, 2005, 2:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Maximum
Apr 28, 2005, 2:35 pm
RE: Mr. Bootlegger Aristotle
Apr 28, 2005, 1:48 pm
Blue company label Murray
Apr 28, 2005, 1:45 pm
Mr. Bootlegger Mr. Blue
Apr 28, 2005, 1:25 pm
Red Vs Blue Wacko
Apr 28, 2005, 1:25 pm
RE: Red v Blue Cos ERIC
Apr 28, 2005, 1:07 pm
This is great Bootlegger
Apr 28, 2005, 1:00 pm
This is great Bootlegger
Apr 28, 2005, 1:00 pm
RE: This is great Red Ed
Apr 28, 2005, 12:50 pm
This is great Blue Boy
Apr 28, 2005, 12:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Blue Lou
Apr 28, 2005, 12:42 pm
RE: RE: Red v Blue Cos Red Ed
Apr 28, 2005, 12:08 pm
RE: Red v Blue Cos locke
Apr 28, 2005, 12:04 pm
Red v Blue Cos Red Ed
Apr 28, 2005, 11:43 am
RED vs. BLUE Companies Beatrice Promoto
Apr 28, 2005, 9:47 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.