National News
Viewing comments for:
Tillinghast Defends U.S. Tort Costs Study Against Criticisms
National News May 18, 2005
The Tillinghast business of Towers Perrin has come out in defense of its annual study of the costs of the U.S. tort system, which has come under fire by a Washington, D.C. economic research ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: TORT COSTS | Chris Russell | May 27, 2005, 3:01 pm |
| TORT COSTS | Antibathos | May 27, 2005, 1:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: TORT COSTS | LLCJ | May 23, 2005, 2:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: TORT COSTS | Chris Russell | May 20, 2005, 6:48 pm |
| RE: Tort Cost Study | LLCJ | May 20, 2005, 12:15 pm |
| Tort Cost Study | Concerned Claims | May 20, 2005, 9:16 am |
| RE: RE: TORT COSTS | LLCJ | May 20, 2005, 7:30 am |
| RE: TORT COSTS | Chris Russell | May 19, 2005, 8:11 pm |
| RE: TORT COSTS | Joanna Eiermann | May 19, 2005, 2:15 pm |
| The Economic Policy Institute | GB | May 19, 2005, 1:50 pm |
| TORT COSTS | Conderned claims person | May 19, 2005, 12:08 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: TORT COSTS
Caps on damages is a bandaid, akin to a useless law saying "thou shalt not have a verdict that looks silly". Reform has to be at the beginning ang through the entire process with unwaivable cash consequences for delay, obfuscation, failure to admit the obvious, gamesmanship and the failure to get to the point.
Because the plaintiffs' bar can bring BS claims with little consequence and because the insurance companies can deploy expensive delaying tactics without penalty we (the public) get an inflated bill for our civil law safety net.