National News

Viewing comments for:

Tillinghast Defends U.S. Tort Costs Study Against Criticisms

National News • May 18, 2005
The Tillinghast business of Towers Perrin has come out in defense of its annual study of the costs of the U.S. tort system, which has come under fire by a Washington, D.C. economic research ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: TORT COSTS

Posted On: May 27, 2005, 3:01 pm CDT
Posted By: Chris Russell
Comment:
In response to Aantibathos, as a Plaintiff's attorney I agree with your statement. I welcome the opportunity to hold the insurance industry accountable for their delays and "frivilous defenses" to claims which in my experience exceed "frivilous lawsuits" by a factor of 10 to 1. Conversly, if an attorney knowingly files a frivilous claim or lawsuit and it is determined to be so, then the attorney should face significant economic consequences as well (suspension of right to practice etc). Unfortunately, such a change will not come to pass because the insurance industry, as a whole, tremendously enjoys the current system. For all the railing about how much money the trial bar spends to influence legislation, the 800 pound gorilla of the economic pie is the insurance industry which can outspend trial attorneys 100 to 1.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: TORT COSTS Chris Russell
May 27, 2005, 3:01 pm
TORT COSTS Antibathos
May 27, 2005, 1:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: TORT COSTS LLCJ
May 23, 2005, 2:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: TORT COSTS Chris Russell
May 20, 2005, 6:48 pm
RE: Tort Cost Study LLCJ
May 20, 2005, 12:15 pm
Tort Cost Study Concerned Claims
May 20, 2005, 9:16 am
RE: RE: TORT COSTS LLCJ
May 20, 2005, 7:30 am
RE: TORT COSTS Chris Russell
May 19, 2005, 8:11 pm
RE: TORT COSTS Joanna Eiermann
May 19, 2005, 2:15 pm
The Economic Policy Institute GB
May 19, 2005, 1:50 pm
TORT COSTS Conderned claims person
May 19, 2005, 12:08 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.