National News
Viewing comments for:
Tort Reform Legislation Passes House, Moves to Senate
National News October 28, 2005
By a vote of 228-184 on Thursday, the House of Representatives favorably approved H.R. 420, the Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act (LARA).
The legislation, introduced by Representative Lamar Smith ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| This article. | Maggi Muirhead | Nov 15, 2006, 9:59 am |
| tort reform | liam w. | Nov 7, 2005, 8:15 pm |
| tort reform | peggy moorhead | Nov 4, 2005, 5:35 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | dginslaw | Nov 1, 2005, 5:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | dginslaw | Nov 1, 2005, 5:13 pm |
| RE: RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | dginslaw | Nov 1, 2005, 5:12 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | Rob | Nov 1, 2005, 4:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | notsolucky | Nov 1, 2005, 2:01 pm |
| RE: RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | Rob | Nov 1, 2005, 7:41 am |
| RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | Ned | Oct 31, 2005, 11:00 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | dginslaw | Oct 31, 2005, 10:34 am |
| RE: RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | Ned | Oct 31, 2005, 7:50 am |
| RE: Trial Lawyer Spin | Dginslaw | Oct 29, 2005, 3:57 pm |
| Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act | James Wilson | Oct 29, 2005, 10:52 am |
| Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act | Larry | Oct 28, 2005, 5:05 pm |
| Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act | Shari Macioch | Oct 28, 2005, 2:16 pm |
| Trial Lawyer Spin | Ned | Oct 28, 2005, 11:59 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act
See this example: http://www.nissan.com/Digest/The_Story.php
I have been involved in a frivolous suit for 3 years as of March '06. Each time we get close to trial, the plaintiff either does not comply with something that we require to defend ourselves, that file some new motion, add a new defenant, etc and the trail is again delayed and costs continue to mount. It is a self propagating system created by attorneys and judges (whom most are all ex-attorneys) and they have no interest in the reform as it is their livelihood â€" at our expense.