National News

Viewing comments for:

Miss. Wind vs. Flood Lawsuit Remanded Back to State Court

National News • March 13, 2006
The Mississippi lawsuit to force insurance companies to honor their policies and pay for damage caused by storm surge has been remanded back to the Chancery Court of Hinds County. Since the state ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: Mediation/Appraisal

Posted On: March 15, 2006, 3:45 pm CST
Posted By: missing the point..
Comment:
I keep hearing that we are "whining"...but to repeat what has been said several times,
1. WE HAD FLOOD INSURANCE. Flood insurance only pays up to $250,000 on structure.
2. WE ALSO HAD HOMEOWNERS, WHICH WAS TO PAY FOR THE WIND.
Thousand of people had homes that $250,000 is not enough to cover the cost to rebuild. Our agents sold us policies that, we were told, would cover us for wind damage.
State Farm execs said that we should get paid. George Dale said that we should get paid. BUT, we are NOT getting paid!!!!!!
I do not consider myself a whiner, nor do Thousands of people have suffered disasterous wind damage, ..they have also paid for flood coverage. We are not asking for FLOOD MONEY. Repeat...WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR FLOOD MONEY!!! We want the courts to clarify the coverage in the policies. Then, we can go to mediation and show our proof of wind loss. If the courts have decided that wind damage should legally be paid, then we will be paid. THAT IS ALL WE ARE ASKING....Heaven forbid that disaster ever strikes the ones who are calling names and trying to insult those of us who are wanting only what is fair....for they will certainly choke on their words.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: Burden of Proof Diane
Mar 22, 2006, 2:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: Burden of Proof DoLittle
Mar 20, 2006, 6:46 pm
RE: RE: Burden of Proof Diane
Mar 20, 2006, 5:19 pm
RE: Burden of Proof DoLittle
Mar 20, 2006, 4:06 pm
Burden of Proof Diane Rose
Mar 20, 2006, 3:14 pm
Coverage DoLittle
Mar 16, 2006, 7:29 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only Mark
Mar 16, 2006, 6:37 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only drudy
Mar 16, 2006, 11:56 am
RE: what state is this? mississippi
Mar 16, 2006, 10:06 am
what state is this? lost in the south
Mar 16, 2006, 10:03 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only flood insurance
Mar 16, 2006, 9:25 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only to "another Mark"
Mar 16, 2006, 9:17 am
RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only Another Mark
Mar 15, 2006, 8:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: Mediation/Appraisal DoLittle
Mar 15, 2006, 5:35 pm
NOT YOU Fortune thingee
Mar 15, 2006, 4:22 pm
RE: RE: Mediation/Appraisal missing the point..
Mar 15, 2006, 3:45 pm
RE: Mediation/Appraisal Future Reading Service
Mar 15, 2006, 3:19 pm
Mediation/Appraisal DoLittle
Mar 15, 2006, 3:06 pm
RE: RE: talking about wind only W.A.
Mar 15, 2006, 1:49 pm
TWIA Mark
Mar 15, 2006, 1:06 pm
RE: talking about wind only only one way to detemine
Mar 15, 2006, 12:48 pm
RE: hal-re:Athenian Republic circa 1810 Hal
Mar 15, 2006, 11:29 am
hal-re:Athenian Republic circa 1810 paul doherty
Mar 15, 2006, 11:24 am
Windstorm Association Hal
Mar 15, 2006, 11:20 am
RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only DoLittle
Mar 15, 2006, 10:59 am
RE: The only one victimizing MS citizens is... fm keller
Mar 15, 2006, 10:45 am
RE: state farm phc
Mar 15, 2006, 10:20 am
state farm drudy
Mar 15, 2006, 10:07 am
Texas Windstorm Ins Association "hurricane policy" Hal
Mar 15, 2006, 10:01 am
RE: RE: talking about wind only consider this
Mar 15, 2006, 10:00 am
RE: Change - 2 drudy
Mar 15, 2006, 9:39 am
RE: talking about wind only DoLittle
Mar 15, 2006, 9:27 am
Wind in Texas Hal
Mar 15, 2006, 9:26 am
RE: RE: Hurricane policy Hal
Mar 15, 2006, 9:21 am
talking about wind only Consider this
Mar 15, 2006, 9:15 am
RE: Hurricane policy DoLittle
Mar 15, 2006, 8:58 am
"Hurricane Policy" Hal
Mar 15, 2006, 8:49 am
Change - 2 DoLittle
Mar 15, 2006, 8:43 am
RE: RE: *&^% &#$( @#$ Hal
Mar 15, 2006, 8:18 am
RE: *&^% &#$( @#$ Chris
Mar 15, 2006, 8:05 am
*&^% &#$( @#$ JR
Mar 14, 2006, 5:34 pm
RE: Change HAL
Mar 14, 2006, 5:16 pm
Change DoLittle
Mar 14, 2006, 5:10 pm
RE: Compromise? Oklahoma Agent
Mar 14, 2006, 4:58 pm
Bad Precedent if they pay. Oklahoma Agent
Mar 14, 2006, 4:57 pm
Kinda like Hal
Mar 14, 2006, 4:48 pm
RE: RE: MISSED MATH Chris
Mar 14, 2006, 3:29 pm
Missed again Hal
Mar 14, 2006, 3:25 pm
RE: MISSED MATH RICK
Mar 14, 2006, 3:10 pm
MISSED MATH Hal
Mar 14, 2006, 3:03 pm
RE: WIND VS WATER RICK
Mar 14, 2006, 1:52 pm
RE: RE: Buddy's right Chris
Mar 14, 2006, 1:49 pm
National Geographic correction Oh Boy !!
Mar 14, 2006, 1:10 pm
RE: RE: Wind Vs. Water TXGuru
Mar 14, 2006, 1:08 pm
3rd party Oh Boy!!
Mar 14, 2006, 1:05 pm
Dean Problem can be solved
Mar 14, 2006, 1:05 pm
Compromise? Amazed Agent
Mar 14, 2006, 1:01 pm
RE: Wind Vs. Water ML
Mar 14, 2006, 12:50 pm
RE: Dean...... A long time agent
Mar 14, 2006, 12:48 pm
Real Question Bob K
Mar 14, 2006, 12:40 pm
Honest and fair honest and fair
Mar 14, 2006, 12:01 pm
Predjudicial Story Wording WIthheld
Mar 14, 2006, 11:55 am
RE: Word Meanings and Humpty Dumpty drudy
Mar 14, 2006, 10:04 am
Word Meanings and Humpty Dumpty Hal
Mar 14, 2006, 9:24 am
RE: The only one victimizing MS citizens is... RICK COULTER
Mar 14, 2006, 9:20 am
RE: Dean...... Andy
Mar 14, 2006, 8:37 am
Dean...... Ian
Mar 14, 2006, 8:13 am
Wind Vs. Water miles
Mar 14, 2006, 4:40 am
Dean Amaised
Mar 13, 2006, 8:24 pm
RE: Buddy's right Dean
Mar 13, 2006, 8:19 pm
Buddy's right Hal
Mar 13, 2006, 6:27 pm
The only one victimizing MS citizens is... buddyL
Mar 13, 2006, 4:17 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.