National News
Viewing comments for:
Miss. Wind vs. Flood Lawsuit Remanded Back to State Court
National News • March 13, 2006
The Mississippi lawsuit to force insurance companies to honor their policies and pay for damage caused by storm surge has been remanded back to the Chancery Court of Hinds County. Since the state ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Burden of Proof | Diane | Mar 22, 2006, 2:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Burden of Proof | DoLittle | Mar 20, 2006, 6:46 pm |
| RE: RE: Burden of Proof | Diane | Mar 20, 2006, 5:19 pm |
| RE: Burden of Proof | DoLittle | Mar 20, 2006, 4:06 pm |
| Burden of Proof | Diane Rose | Mar 20, 2006, 3:14 pm |
| Coverage | DoLittle | Mar 16, 2006, 7:29 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only | Mark | Mar 16, 2006, 6:37 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only | drudy | Mar 16, 2006, 11:56 am |
| RE: what state is this? | mississippi | Mar 16, 2006, 10:06 am |
| what state is this? | lost in the south | Mar 16, 2006, 10:03 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only | flood insurance | Mar 16, 2006, 9:25 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only | to "another Mark" | Mar 16, 2006, 9:17 am |
| RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only | Another Mark | Mar 15, 2006, 8:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Mediation/Appraisal | DoLittle | Mar 15, 2006, 5:35 pm |
| NOT YOU | Fortune thingee | Mar 15, 2006, 4:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Mediation/Appraisal | missing the point.. | Mar 15, 2006, 3:45 pm |
| RE: Mediation/Appraisal | Future Reading Service | Mar 15, 2006, 3:19 pm |
| Mediation/Appraisal | DoLittle | Mar 15, 2006, 3:06 pm |
| RE: RE: talking about wind only | W.A. | Mar 15, 2006, 1:49 pm |
| TWIA | Mark | Mar 15, 2006, 1:06 pm |
| RE: talking about wind only | only one way to detemine | Mar 15, 2006, 12:48 pm |
| RE: hal-re:Athenian Republic circa 1810 | Hal | Mar 15, 2006, 11:29 am |
| hal-re:Athenian Republic circa 1810 | paul doherty | Mar 15, 2006, 11:24 am |
| Windstorm Association | Hal | Mar 15, 2006, 11:20 am |
| RE: RE: RE: talking about wind only | DoLittle | Mar 15, 2006, 10:59 am |
| RE: The only one victimizing MS citizens is... | fm keller | Mar 15, 2006, 10:45 am |
| RE: state farm | phc | Mar 15, 2006, 10:20 am |
| state farm | drudy | Mar 15, 2006, 10:07 am |
| Texas Windstorm Ins Association "hurricane policy" | Hal | Mar 15, 2006, 10:01 am |
| RE: RE: talking about wind only | consider this | Mar 15, 2006, 10:00 am |
| RE: Change - 2 | drudy | Mar 15, 2006, 9:39 am |
| RE: talking about wind only | DoLittle | Mar 15, 2006, 9:27 am |
| Wind in Texas | Hal | Mar 15, 2006, 9:26 am |
| RE: RE: Hurricane policy | Hal | Mar 15, 2006, 9:21 am |
| talking about wind only | Consider this | Mar 15, 2006, 9:15 am |
| RE: Hurricane policy | DoLittle | Mar 15, 2006, 8:58 am |
| "Hurricane Policy" | Hal | Mar 15, 2006, 8:49 am |
| Change - 2 | DoLittle | Mar 15, 2006, 8:43 am |
| RE: RE: *&^% &#$( @#$ | Hal | Mar 15, 2006, 8:18 am |
| RE: *&^% &#$( @#$ | Chris | Mar 15, 2006, 8:05 am |
| *&^% &#$( @#$ | JR | Mar 14, 2006, 5:34 pm |
| RE: Change | HAL | Mar 14, 2006, 5:16 pm |
| Change | DoLittle | Mar 14, 2006, 5:10 pm |
| RE: Compromise? | Oklahoma Agent | Mar 14, 2006, 4:58 pm |
| Bad Precedent if they pay. | Oklahoma Agent | Mar 14, 2006, 4:57 pm |
| Kinda like | Hal | Mar 14, 2006, 4:48 pm |
| RE: RE: MISSED MATH | Chris | Mar 14, 2006, 3:29 pm |
| Missed again | Hal | Mar 14, 2006, 3:25 pm |
| RE: MISSED MATH | RICK | Mar 14, 2006, 3:10 pm |
| MISSED MATH | Hal | Mar 14, 2006, 3:03 pm |
| RE: WIND VS WATER | RICK | Mar 14, 2006, 1:52 pm |
| RE: RE: Buddy's right | Chris | Mar 14, 2006, 1:49 pm |
| National Geographic correction | Oh Boy !! | Mar 14, 2006, 1:10 pm |
| RE: RE: Wind Vs. Water | TXGuru | Mar 14, 2006, 1:08 pm |
| 3rd party | Oh Boy!! | Mar 14, 2006, 1:05 pm |
| Dean | Problem can be solved | Mar 14, 2006, 1:05 pm |
| Compromise? | Amazed Agent | Mar 14, 2006, 1:01 pm |
| RE: Wind Vs. Water | ML | Mar 14, 2006, 12:50 pm |
| RE: Dean...... | A long time agent | Mar 14, 2006, 12:48 pm |
| Real Question | Bob K | Mar 14, 2006, 12:40 pm |
| Honest and fair | honest and fair | Mar 14, 2006, 12:01 pm |
| Predjudicial Story Wording | WIthheld | Mar 14, 2006, 11:55 am |
| RE: Word Meanings and Humpty Dumpty | drudy | Mar 14, 2006, 10:04 am |
| Word Meanings and Humpty Dumpty | Hal | Mar 14, 2006, 9:24 am |
| RE: The only one victimizing MS citizens is... | RICK COULTER | Mar 14, 2006, 9:20 am |
| RE: Dean...... | Andy | Mar 14, 2006, 8:37 am |
| Dean...... | Ian | Mar 14, 2006, 8:13 am |
| Wind Vs. Water | miles | Mar 14, 2006, 4:40 am |
| Dean | Amaised | Mar 13, 2006, 8:24 pm |
| RE: Buddy's right | Dean | Mar 13, 2006, 8:19 pm |
| Buddy's right | Hal | Mar 13, 2006, 6:27 pm |
| The only one victimizing MS citizens is... | buddyL | Mar 13, 2006, 4:17 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Burden of Proof
Here's what I'd do:
Ask you your insurance company to show you proof of what was damaged by wind and proof of what was damaged by the storm surge. They will not be able to provide that proof. Then ask them to pay you for a total loss since the benefit of any doubt is on your side. It is the insurance companies burden to prove that After they put in writing that they will not pay, send them a letter asking them what the process is for them to defend your PROPERTY in a lawsuit. Find the clause in your policy and quote it back to them in writing. Try to get them to hire the lawyer, not you.