Federal Judge in Mississippi 'Storm Surge' Case Upholds Home Insurance Flood Exclusion
National News • April 13, 2006
A federal judge in Mississippi has upheld the water damage exclusion in homeowners insurance policies in a ruling welcomed by insurers.
U.S. District Judge L.T. Senter, Jr. of the Southern ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
Subject: RE: Rodger - From Roger Poe
Posted On: April 15, 2006, 10:43 am CDT
Posted By: Roger Poe
Comment:
4-15-2006
It's interesting to note that the replacement cost value / replacement cost value underpayment estimation schemes are not mentioned by ex-contractor, or certain claim "adjusting" types, here.
Is it me, or did no one mention, what-so-ever, about deceptive business trade practices by certain insurers that can steal money from their client?
Now why could that be?
Could be that not giving real, or full, names, indicates public domain facts, (facts that certain ones are guilty of helping to exist), makes them want to hide behind insulting and mocking conduct.
Most vermin scurry away when the spotlight comes on, unless ill.
As long as illicit / fake / synthetic construction replacment cost estimations keep fooling the general public, and all that that means, in the premium calculation-to-claim loss ratio / contingent profit loop, via certain insurers and claim "adjusting" types, others will keep exposing it.
Confess, or continue to make a great living...that must be a real issue for some...
Insurers don't want money taken from them that they don't owe...but are all just as dedicated to repay what they do owe?
Hardly...
rogerpoegc@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Rodger - From Roger Poe
It's interesting to note that the replacement cost value / replacement cost value underpayment estimation schemes are not mentioned by ex-contractor, or certain claim "adjusting" types, here.
Is it me, or did no one mention, what-so-ever, about deceptive business trade practices by certain insurers that can steal money from their client?
Now why could that be?
Could be that not giving real, or full, names, indicates public domain facts, (facts that certain ones are guilty of helping to exist), makes them want to hide behind insulting and mocking conduct.
Most vermin scurry away when the spotlight comes on, unless ill.
As long as illicit / fake / synthetic construction replacment cost estimations keep fooling the general public, and all that that means, in the premium calculation-to-claim loss ratio / contingent profit loop, via certain insurers and claim "adjusting" types, others will keep exposing it.
Confess, or continue to make a great living...that must be a real issue for some...
Insurers don't want money taken from them that they don't owe...but are all just as dedicated to repay what they do owe?
Hardly...
rogerpoegc@yahoo.com