Federal Judge in Mississippi 'Storm Surge' Case Upholds Home Insurance Flood Exclusion
National News • April 13, 2006
A federal judge in Mississippi has upheld the water damage exclusion in homeowners insurance policies in a ruling welcomed by insurers.
U.S. District Judge L.T. Senter, Jr. of the Southern ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
Subject: RE: RE: Insurers and adjusters are playing with consumers.
Posted On: May 18, 2006, 10:05 pm CDT
Posted By: Tony
Comment:
Roger,
Of course what I and others have to say doesn't bother you.......... You have your opinion (God Bless America that you have that right) and to Hades with those who have the temerity to side against you.
To echo NK's thoughts, why didn't Martha speak up when she was getting paid by the insurer? If fraudulent, deceptive or unfair claim practices were going on, then she should have notified the local authorities (what state, I am no sure as there is no mention) and done something about it then. Seems to me that Martha is rather self-serving in that NOW she has a problem with what is going on, but didn't mention it when her paycheck was being signed by the insurance company.
BTW, I am not condemning you Martha, just wondering why you didn't do the right thing (whistleblowing) when you had the opportunity. I know that if the company I worked for did something illegal, I would certainly mention it. My morals wouldn't let me do anything else.
Subject: RE: RE: Insurers and adjusters are playing with consumers.
Of course what I and others have to say doesn't bother you.......... You have your opinion (God Bless America that you have that right) and to Hades with those who have the temerity to side against you.
To echo NK's thoughts, why didn't Martha speak up when she was getting paid by the insurer? If fraudulent, deceptive or unfair claim practices were going on, then she should have notified the local authorities (what state, I am no sure as there is no mention) and done something about it then. Seems to me that Martha is rather self-serving in that NOW she has a problem with what is going on, but didn't mention it when her paycheck was being signed by the insurance company.
BTW, I am not condemning you Martha, just wondering why you didn't do the right thing (whistleblowing) when you had the opportunity. I know that if the company I worked for did something illegal, I would certainly mention it. My morals wouldn't let me do anything else.