National News

Viewing comments for:

Study: Four Out of 10 Medical Malpractice Cases are Groundless

National News • May 11, 2006
About 40 percent of the medical malpractice cases filed in the United States are groundless, according to a Harvard analysis of the hotly debated issue that pits trial lawyers against doctors, ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Personal Injury Tort Reform

Posted On: May 14, 2006, 5:06 pm CDT
Posted By: George from OZ
Comment:
Tort reform in 2002, in the State of New South Wales, Australia, introduced many changes from the basic Common Law system that prevailed until then. Amongst many changes were:
1. a 15% of a worst case threshold before there is an entitlement to claim (a worst case being defined as a brain damaged quad);
2. caps on damages, including future loss of income and care;
3. a cost penalty against a lawyer who serves a frivolous claim, or cross claim - this penalty being imposed by a judge against the lawyer personally, not his law firm.
These reforms have not only lifted the ethics of Plaintiff lawyers but reduced the number of litigated injury claims (including med mal) by over 60%
Insurance companies are happy, and their clients are happy with their reduced premiums. But the Plaintiff and insurer lawyers are feeling the pain, and those Plaintiff lawyers who have copped a personal cost order are in absolute agony.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: Personal Injury Tort Reform bigbear5033
May 16, 2006, 11:46 am
RE: RE: Personal Injury Tort Reform George from OZ
May 15, 2006, 4:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Tort reform is a debatable. medmal junkie
May 15, 2006, 1:15 pm
RE: Personal Injury Tort Reform bigbear5033
May 15, 2006, 8:07 am
Personal Injury Tort Reform George from OZ
May 14, 2006, 5:06 pm
RE: RE: RE: Tort reform is a debatable. kmerian
May 12, 2006, 11:21 pm
RE: Talking more with Willing to Bet--The Whole Comment I ho bigbear5033
May 12, 2006, 6:36 pm
Talking more with Willing to Bet--The Whole Comment I hope dothetime
May 12, 2006, 2:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: Talking more with Willing to Bet dothetime-redux
May 12, 2006, 2:44 pm
RE: RE: Talking more with Willing to Bet dothetime
May 12, 2006, 2:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: Tort reform is a debatable. Willing to bet
May 12, 2006, 1:30 pm
RE: RE: Jeffrey Martin and Mike - Tort reform is a good thin Dawn
May 12, 2006, 1:28 pm
RE: RE: Tort reform is a debatable. dothetime
May 12, 2006, 1:17 pm
RE: Jeffrey Martin and Mike - Tort reform is a good thing. Also Willing to Bet
May 12, 2006, 1:14 pm
RE: Tort reform is a debatable. dothetime
May 12, 2006, 12:56 pm
RE: Jeffrey Martin and Mike - Tort reform is a good thing. Dr. Vinnie Boombotz
May 12, 2006, 12:42 pm
Jeffrey Martin and Mike - Tort reform is a good thing. Willing to Bet
May 11, 2006, 5:54 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.