National News
Viewing comments for:
Sen. Sununu Opens Hearings on Federal Regulation of Insurance
National News July 11, 2006
U.S. Senator John Sununu (R-NH), who introduced the National Insurance Act of 2006 with Senator Tim Johnson (D-SD) on April 5, 2006, opened hearings today on the controversial legislation that ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Federal regulation | Neel | Jul 21, 2006, 12:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Federal regulation | Pat | Jul 12, 2006, 8:18 am |
| Free Enterprise Vs Entitlement | Mark | Jul 11, 2006, 5:39 pm |
| RE: RE: Federal regulation | Jim | Jul 11, 2006, 4:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Federal regulation | Humor | Jul 11, 2006, 1:50 pm |
| Federal regulations & Sununu | Nan | Jul 11, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Federal regulation | Bob | Jul 11, 2006, 12:50 pm |
| RE: Federal regulation | Rick | Jul 11, 2006, 12:44 pm |
| Federal regulation | Edwin | Jul 11, 2006, 12:13 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Free Enterprise Vs Entitlement
Let's not confuse free enterprise insurance run by the private sector (cherry picking if you will) with government run programs like unemployment, medicaid/care, and what NH elected officials want (take all comers at one price regardless). I recall NH has had more than one insurance crisis due to socialist insurance regulations based on taxpayer "savings" to the point where no carrier could make a profit -- any profit. Either permit a profit to be made or no carrier will do business in the State. "Live Free or Die" also applies to the cost of insurance.
50 state regulations cause an unbelieveable administrative load on national carriers -- and that load is borne by all customers. Adopting a common regulatory (rates, rules and filings to start) environment won't bring roll-backs, but will control out-of-control administrative costs for such things as 50 seperate Market Conduct Study departments (who by the way in some states directly charge all their costs back to the carrier they are currently investigating - so exactly who do they work for?)