National News
Viewing comments for:
Spitzer Notifies Insurers Contingent Commissions No Longer an Option
National News November 30, 2006
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer has notified four leading insurance companies that, under agreements reached with his office earlier this year, they may no longer pay "contingent ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: working more for less | Les | Dec 11, 2006, 10:42 am |
| RE: What's next for agents of 4 carriers in 2007? | B.P. in CA | Dec 7, 2006, 7:04 pm |
| What's next for agents of 4 carriers in 2007? | Dazed and Confused Too | Dec 7, 2006, 4:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Prostitution 103 and now this! | Reality Check | Dec 5, 2006, 3:40 pm |
| What would you do/say? | Death Beast | Dec 5, 2006, 3:29 pm |
| RE: Ralph Nader | Death Beast | Dec 5, 2006, 3:23 pm |
| RE: Prostitution 103 and now this! | Death Beast | Dec 5, 2006, 3:12 pm |
| Sister of the industry 6:55AM | Hawk | Dec 5, 2006, 11:22 am |
| RE: RE: The controversy continues | Reality Check | Dec 5, 2006, 8:03 am |
| RE: The controversy continues | Jack J Maniscalco | Dec 5, 2006, 7:16 am |
| The controversy continues | Sister of the industry | Dec 5, 2006, 6:55 am |
| Problems in NY | Local Agent in NY | Dec 4, 2006, 4:50 pm |
| RE: Company Guy | Company Guy | Dec 4, 2006, 3:09 pm |
| RE: Company Guy | Jack J Maniscalco | Dec 4, 2006, 3:06 pm |
| Company Guy | 50 Year Agent | Dec 4, 2006, 2:55 pm |
| RE: Company Guy | Company Guy | Dec 4, 2006, 2:49 pm |
| Company Guy | 50 year agent | Dec 4, 2006, 2:41 pm |
| Ralph Nader | Tonka | Dec 4, 2006, 2:36 pm |
| You Would Capitulate Too With A Gun At Your Head | Company Guy | Dec 4, 2006, 2:29 pm |
| Why weren't we there? | Tom Drawert | Dec 4, 2006, 2:25 pm |
| Independent Reality of 9:51AM | John B | Dec 4, 2006, 2:24 pm |
| RE: Why weren't we there? | Tom Drawert | Dec 4, 2006, 2:24 pm |
| The Travelers sell out | LLB | Dec 4, 2006, 2:05 pm |
| RE: New York rules the entire country??? | bill P | Dec 4, 2006, 1:24 pm |
| RE next? Yea right | grumpy | Dec 4, 2006, 1:06 pm |
| RE: RE: Prostitution 103 and now this! | Reality Check | Dec 4, 2006, 12:45 pm |
| RE: RE: Ban Lawyer's Contingent Fees, too! | d.alumbaugh | Dec 4, 2006, 12:14 pm |
| RE: Prostitution 103 and now this! | Reality Checkmate Agent | Dec 4, 2006, 11:45 am |
| Contingent Commissions | New York City Agent | Dec 4, 2006, 11:29 am |
| RE: Contingent Politicians | Hilton G. Martin | Dec 4, 2006, 11:08 am |
| Prostitution 103 and now this! | Reality Check | Dec 4, 2006, 10:17 am |
| RE: What's next? | diane | Dec 4, 2006, 7:56 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Contingent Politicians | Bea | Dec 4, 2006, 7:05 am |
| RE: Spit | Be | Dec 4, 2006, 7:03 am |
| NY Problems | Local Agent in NY | Dec 3, 2006, 7:14 am |
| RE: Ban Lawyer's Contingent Fees, too! | Prakash V. Naor | Dec 2, 2006, 11:46 am |
| Ban Lawyer's Contingent Fees, too! | Bill | Dec 2, 2006, 10:46 am |
| Governor-elect Spitzer | NY agent | Dec 1, 2006, 10:25 pm |
| Spit | LG | Dec 1, 2006, 6:41 pm |
| RE: RE: Contingent Politicians | HARRY | Dec 1, 2006, 4:26 pm |
| RE: Contingent Politicians | Oklahoma Agent | Dec 1, 2006, 4:18 pm |
| RE: Spitzer | Dick | Dec 1, 2006, 4:16 pm |
| RE: Contingent Politicians | joe | Dec 1, 2006, 4:02 pm |
| RE: Independent Reality | Buiness Man | Dec 1, 2006, 3:56 pm |
| What's next? | MindingmyBusiness | Dec 1, 2006, 3:52 pm |
| Contingent Politicians | Let's See | Dec 1, 2006, 3:47 pm |
| RE: What's next? | Bob | Dec 1, 2006, 3:34 pm |
| What's next? | Dazed and confused | Dec 1, 2006, 3:20 pm |
| Spitzer | Mark Hester | Dec 1, 2006, 3:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Independent Reality | Chuck | Dec 1, 2006, 3:11 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Independent Reality | Mark | Dec 1, 2006, 3:07 pm |
| RE: RE: Independent Reality | Bob | Dec 1, 2006, 3:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Independent Reality | Jack J Maniscalco | Dec 1, 2006, 2:49 pm |
| RE: Independent Reality | dan | Dec 1, 2006, 2:43 pm |
| RE: RE: Independent Reality | Steve | Dec 1, 2006, 2:40 pm |
| RE: Independent Reality | Ray | Dec 1, 2006, 2:35 pm |
| RE: RE: Independent Reality | Marm | Dec 1, 2006, 2:33 pm |
| RE: Independent Reality | Scott | Dec 1, 2006, 2:25 pm |
| New York rules the entire country??? | Nancy Lee | Dec 1, 2006, 12:45 pm |
| Contingent Commissions | Dale Longfellow | Dec 1, 2006, 12:32 pm |
| Another way | Seems to me | Dec 1, 2006, 11:11 am |
| Contingent Commissions | Lawrence Whalley | Dec 1, 2006, 11:02 am |
| Independent Reality | Independent? | Dec 1, 2006, 9:51 am |
| Justice? | David | Dec 1, 2006, 8:05 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: RE: Independent Reality
Perhaps this is a move for the AG's to promote disclosure by making it easier to understand, since there will be no complicated formulas.
What keeps being missed is Consumers don't care today what an agent earns, they care what their premium is. Once we start creating an illusion that the percent commission is valuable information and part of a decision process then it suggests a carrier that pays less commission is a better choice. We will head down a very bad road for the consumer.
Finally also getting lost is that it is a small handful of AG's, there are some states that see no value at all at the insurance department level, and in some states the requirements are against current regulations. There is an old phrase if you can't legislate, regulate and if you can't succeed there, litigate.
With so many valuable real issues around capacity, availability, flood, wind, coverage details, expenses, fraud etc... it's amazing so much effort (money) is being spent here.