National News

Viewing comments for:

Key Federal Katrina Ruling Favoring Homeowners Surprises Industry

National News • January 12, 2007
In a Hurricane Katrina claims decision that surprised the insurance industry, a federal judge ruled that State Farm did not provide sufficient evidence to prove what damage to a Mississippi ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Insurance Gridlock

Posted On: January 16, 2007, 11:05 am CST
Posted By: Ross Perot
Comment:
This water thingamajig reminds me of how polarized we are, we gots the pro-water flood insurers against the pro-winddamage pay me cuz I had insurance folk; it reminds of of the wal-mart vs union, Iraq war vs surrenderers, vegietariens vs carnievors, and even right vs left...even
reminds me of government; gridlock that is; you got the reds hatin' the blues, and the blues hatin' the reds; dat's why nuttin' gets done in Washington; it's like the big fish and the little fish; the big fish wants to eat, and the little fish wants to eat, but the big fish wants to eat the little fish, and the little fish doesn't want to be eat. See, that's like government. What we need is universal flood coverage; put a $500k cap on it, but a 15% deductible; that way you makes flood people take responsibility for some of their loss, but you can provide coverage to the really well off people like me who need extra coverage for their beach property. That, and we should tax gas 50 cents per gallon on top of the current taxes to balance the budget.
Subject Posted By Posted On
State Farm settled out of court Jan 19, 2007 HOMEOWNER Insured w/State Farm
Jan 19, 2007, 10:02 pm
Stand United: Before the next Katrina Kim David
Jan 19, 2007, 7:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: fair Chad Balaamaba
Jan 19, 2007, 4:32 pm
feel felt found gill fin
Jan 19, 2007, 2:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: fair Linda
Jan 19, 2007, 2:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: fair chad balaamaba
Jan 19, 2007, 11:52 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: fair Kat
Jan 19, 2007, 11:27 am
RE: RE: RE: fair Chad Balaamaba
Jan 19, 2007, 11:20 am
RE: RE: fair Linda
Jan 19, 2007, 10:58 am
RE: fair Chad Balaamaba
Jan 19, 2007, 10:48 am
fair ML
Jan 19, 2007, 10:01 am
Chad: Was the Driver Insured by State Farm? State Farm A Bad Neighbor
Jan 16, 2007, 4:09 pm
SF in comtempt in OK class action Katrina Victim
Jan 16, 2007, 3:57 pm
Insurance Gridlock Ross Perot
Jan 16, 2007, 11:05 am
Katrina Ruling Ray Balaamababa
Jan 16, 2007, 10:57 am
This reminds me of my last visit to Wal-Mart Chad Balaamaba
Jan 16, 2007, 10:50 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Wasn't On the Jury
Jan 16, 2007, 12:52 am
RE: RE: RE: How much? Other References
Jan 16, 2007, 12:45 am
RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Gulf Visitor
Jan 15, 2007, 11:29 pm
RE: You can't be bullies with a contract of adhesion Gulf Visitor
Jan 15, 2007, 11:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Gulfport Visitor
Jan 15, 2007, 11:06 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? Gulfport Visitor
Jan 15, 2007, 11:03 pm
RE: RE: How much? Gulf Visitor
Jan 15, 2007, 10:59 pm
RE: How much? Read Policy Language
Jan 15, 2007, 9:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? Blame the Company
Jan 15, 2007, 9:40 pm
RE: Send Them to IRAQ + Bring Our Americans Home Gulf Visitor
Jan 15, 2007, 7:41 pm
How much? Gulf Visitor
Jan 15, 2007, 7:16 pm
World Book Encyclopedia: Katrina worst in USA history State Farm Policy Holder
Jan 15, 2007, 4:51 pm
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Rick Frazier
Jan 15, 2007, 4:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Bear Fan
Jan 15, 2007, 4:31 pm
RE: RE: Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? Common Sense has left you???
Jan 15, 2007, 2:42 pm
RE: Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? Read the Article
Jan 15, 2007, 10:55 am
RE: State Fm Policy: No Wind, No Water but 2 Deductibles fmkeller
Jan 15, 2007, 8:01 am
Send Them to IRAQ + Bring Our Americans Home Pirates of Snake Farm
Jan 15, 2007, 2:16 am
State Fm Policy: No Wind, No Water but 2 Deductibles State Farm Homeowner
Jan 15, 2007, 1:58 am
To: KAY State Farm said... It Was All Water Bay St. Louis HOMEOWNER
Jan 15, 2007, 1:20 am
RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Kay
Jan 14, 2007, 11:55 pm
Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? Gulf Visitor
Jan 14, 2007, 5:11 pm
RE: Justice Has Been Done thefactsmatter
Jan 13, 2007, 4:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause thefactsmatter
Jan 13, 2007, 4:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause drudy
Jan 13, 2007, 3:20 pm
RE: RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Four Ways Forward
Jan 13, 2007, 2:08 pm
RE: Justice Has Been Done Rate Fixer
Jan 13, 2007, 1:09 pm
Justice Has Been Done State Farm Policy Holder
Jan 13, 2007, 12:13 pm
RE: RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause boonedoggle
Jan 13, 2007, 11:58 am
RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause thefactsmatter
Jan 13, 2007, 8:02 am
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Homeowner USA
Jan 13, 2007, 12:42 am
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Katrina Survivor
Jan 13, 2007, 12:32 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Punitive Damages
Jan 12, 2007, 11:52 pm
RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Clarity Missing
Jan 12, 2007, 11:42 pm
RE: Smart Insuror St. Fine Print
Jan 12, 2007, 10:26 pm
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Gulf visitor
Jan 12, 2007, 9:06 pm
RE: Katrina ruling Robert T Blessing
Jan 12, 2007, 8:13 pm
Katrina Ruling Smart Insurer
Jan 12, 2007, 6:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling boonedoggle
Jan 12, 2007, 6:29 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling Exclusivity
Jan 12, 2007, 5:26 pm
Katrina Ruling Mike
Jan 12, 2007, 5:12 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling dd
Jan 12, 2007, 4:27 pm
Problem solved Linda
Jan 12, 2007, 3:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling ernie
Jan 12, 2007, 3:38 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling wgw
Jan 12, 2007, 3:37 pm
Coastal RE marty
Jan 12, 2007, 3:34 pm
Coastal RE good point
Jan 12, 2007, 3:24 pm
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Mark
Jan 12, 2007, 3:07 pm
Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Mark
Jan 12, 2007, 2:51 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Dennis
Jan 12, 2007, 2:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Marty
Jan 12, 2007, 2:13 pm
Nationwide homeowner insurance rates. Rate Fixer
Jan 12, 2007, 2:07 pm
RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling - correct to NOT need Punitive Rich
Jan 12, 2007, 2:05 pm
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Rich
Jan 12, 2007, 2:01 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling Marty
Jan 12, 2007, 1:53 pm
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Public Adjuster
Jan 12, 2007, 1:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Linda
Jan 12, 2007, 1:46 pm
RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling NM Bill
Jan 12, 2007, 1:44 pm
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Public Adjuster
Jan 12, 2007, 1:35 pm
You can't be bullies with a contract of adhesion media mogul
Jan 12, 2007, 1:33 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling Inside Looking Out
Jan 12, 2007, 1:31 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling Misty Meanor
Jan 12, 2007, 1:26 pm
Katrina ruling Richard Hartzen
Jan 12, 2007, 1:22 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling GG
Jan 12, 2007, 1:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Waiting for scientific fact
Jan 12, 2007, 1:17 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling Jeff Dixon
Jan 12, 2007, 1:14 pm
Katrina ruling Not Surprised
Jan 12, 2007, 1:11 pm
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling Ignorance times 12
Jan 12, 2007, 1:05 pm
Wow, another crappy story with no facts Smitty
Jan 12, 2007, 1:02 pm
Katrina Ruling Public Adjuster
Jan 12, 2007, 12:58 pm
RE: RE: Katrina Ruling M D Huntley
Jan 12, 2007, 12:54 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling Pat
Jan 12, 2007, 12:51 pm
RE: Katrina Ruling Melissa
Jan 12, 2007, 12:47 pm
Katrina Ruling Florida Resident
Jan 12, 2007, 12:37 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.