Posted On: January 15, 2007, 4:32 pm CST

Posted By: Mjolnir

I completely agree with your assessment, and I wouldn't rely on data that old either.

I simply pointed out that a fast desk-top search proved UW wrong. I do believe that a deep search of current scientific research would show that many scientists have questions about the origin and end result of the current warming phase.

I was responding to UW's assertion that no "pier" (peer) reviewed articles were out there. Clearly, that is not true. Just as clearly, if personal opinion is the extent of UW's research, we should (perhaps) re-evaluate the assertion that the american public should be fiscally and regulatorily punished for global warming.

If humanity is the prime cause, and this warming is not a natural swing, and the 5% of greenhouse gasses we emit is the tipping balance, then I will submit to the regulations and costs.

I'll be honest- I won't do it gladly, but I won't revolt either.

I'm not complaining about the price of gasoline, am I? :D