Posted On: January 16, 2007, 2:36 pm CST

Posted By: Mjolnir

Bob, you have me confused. Do you have an article or study to refute the Mount Saint Helens claim?

There is evidence to support your contention that global warming is caused by humanity.

There is also evidence to support the contention that global warming is the result of natural processes.

At what point do you stop accusing us of being backwards, and start realizing that there is room for serious debate?

My stance, based on my personal understanding of articles in science journals, is that the jury is stilll out.

Your stance, based on your understanding of information you've recieved, is that the case is closed.

What, in those two statements, makes you a genius with the right to call names?

I've been very clear that I oppose legislation based on partially understood processes.

You've been very clear that you think anyone with a different opinion from yours is stupid.

That makes you look like a narrow minded, self aggrandizing monkey who merely regurgitates popular media spin.

Although entertaining, that stance doesn't do a whole lot to advance the conversation about the proposed legislation.