Posted On: February 15, 2007, 4:43 pm CST

Posted By: Sheba

Right. Here's a summary of the Supreme Court case holding the opposite. This law change legislatively reversed the high court. Believe it or not, we still have P/C insurers willing to write coverage up here:

"A home owned by Jerome Bongen and Elizabeth Bongen was destroyed by a mudslide. After their insurer denied coverage, the Bongens sued. They alleged that the mudslide was caused by construction activity carried out above their property. On cross- motions for partial summary judgment, the superior court held that a provision in the Bongens' insurance policy excluding from coverage any loss resulting from earth movement, regardless of the cause, was unenforceable. We reverse."