National News

Viewing comments for:

Bipartisan Flood Insurance 'Modernization' Bill Boosts Borrowing, Maximum Limits

National News • March 27, 2007
U.S. Reps. Judy Biggert, R-Ill., and Barney Frank, D-Mass., introduced bipartisan legislation to revamp the National Flood Insurance Program that boosts the program's borrowing authority to $21.5 ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Let us examine

Posted On: March 28, 2007, 9:24 am CDT
Posted By: adjusterjoe
Comment:
just a few basic principles that we all should be able to agree upon.
1. Insurance is based upon statistical data.
2. Insurance is designed to "spread" or disburse the risk over a geographic area as well as over social and economic areas.

Now let us examine flood insurance.

1. Flood insurance is written in an area where flood is iminent, therefore by design and practivcal application, it meets neither of the criteria noted above with insurance, therefore, it is not in a true sense insurance, but governemt welfare. Now, why is it wrong to oppose the escalation of government welfare programs.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: appraisals Evan
Apr 2, 2007, 11:07 am
appraisals LL
Mar 30, 2007, 7:58 pm
RE: RE: Higher Benefits won't Help - if Evan
Mar 30, 2007, 7:50 am
RE: Higher Benefits won't Help - if adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 4:37 pm
Higher Benefits won't Help - if dh
Mar 29, 2007, 3:55 pm
Thank you adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 8:24 am
no appraisal needed LL
Mar 28, 2007, 10:29 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject KAT
Mar 28, 2007, 1:58 pm
RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:39 pm
RE: Back to the Original Subject KAT
Mar 28, 2007, 1:28 pm
RE: second home owners again take a beating! adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:14 pm
Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 11:07 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Ba adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 11:04 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Id Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 10:57 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:40 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 10:24 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:15 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:12 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 9:59 am
Let us examine adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 9:24 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea djusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:59 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:51 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 8:51 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea DH
Mar 28, 2007, 8:42 am
RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea ML
Mar 28, 2007, 8:39 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:35 am
RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 8:11 am
RE: Annual Report... adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 7:43 am
Annual Report... DDT
Mar 28, 2007, 7:09 am
RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 5:12 pm
RE: Premiums adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 4:55 pm
Premiums Andrew
Mar 27, 2007, 4:45 pm
RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 4:02 pm
stricter building codes needed Mike
Mar 27, 2007, 3:58 pm
second home owners again take a beating! don Hester
Mar 27, 2007, 3:54 pm
RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 27, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: Extremely Bad Idea Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 3:09 pm
Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 2:47 pm
RE: flood losses Linda
Mar 27, 2007, 1:51 pm
flood losses Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 1:12 pm
RE: skeptical Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 1:06 pm
skeptical Compman
Mar 27, 2007, 12:33 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.