National News

Viewing comments for:

Bipartisan Flood Insurance 'Modernization' Bill Boosts Borrowing, Maximum Limits

National News • March 27, 2007
U.S. Reps. Judy Biggert, R-Ill., and Barney Frank, D-Mass., introduced bipartisan legislation to revamp the National Flood Insurance Program that boosts the program's borrowing authority to $21.5 ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: second home owners again take a beating!

Posted On: March 28, 2007, 1:14 pm CDT
Posted By: adjusterjoe
Comment:
don Hester: I hate to point out the bad apples in my profession, however, will do so. Back at the time of origin of the NFIP, adjusters were paid an hourly rate and time and expense. The adjusters were greedy and billed in excess of 35-40 hours per day on flood claims. They would work 5-7 flood cliams per day and bill each at 5-8 hours. Hence, the feds prosecuted some for fraud. The schedule came into effect shortly thereafter. The reason second homeowners are charged more for their seocnd home is that it sits vacant for many months a year and is subject to loss greater than an occupied house.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: appraisals Evan
Apr 2, 2007, 11:07 am
appraisals LL
Mar 30, 2007, 7:58 pm
RE: RE: Higher Benefits won't Help - if Evan
Mar 30, 2007, 7:50 am
RE: Higher Benefits won't Help - if adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 4:37 pm
Higher Benefits won't Help - if dh
Mar 29, 2007, 3:55 pm
Thank you adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 8:24 am
no appraisal needed LL
Mar 28, 2007, 10:29 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject KAT
Mar 28, 2007, 1:58 pm
RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:39 pm
RE: Back to the Original Subject KAT
Mar 28, 2007, 1:28 pm
RE: second home owners again take a beating! adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:14 pm
Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 11:07 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Ba adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 11:04 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Id Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 10:57 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:40 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 10:24 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:15 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:12 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 9:59 am
Let us examine adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 9:24 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea djusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:59 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:51 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 8:51 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea DH
Mar 28, 2007, 8:42 am
RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea ML
Mar 28, 2007, 8:39 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:35 am
RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 8:11 am
RE: Annual Report... adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 7:43 am
Annual Report... DDT
Mar 28, 2007, 7:09 am
RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 5:12 pm
RE: Premiums adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 4:55 pm
Premiums Andrew
Mar 27, 2007, 4:45 pm
RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 4:02 pm
stricter building codes needed Mike
Mar 27, 2007, 3:58 pm
second home owners again take a beating! don Hester
Mar 27, 2007, 3:54 pm
RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 27, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: Extremely Bad Idea Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 3:09 pm
Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 2:47 pm
RE: flood losses Linda
Mar 27, 2007, 1:51 pm
flood losses Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 1:12 pm
RE: skeptical Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 1:06 pm
skeptical Compman
Mar 27, 2007, 12:33 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.