National News

Viewing comments for:

Bipartisan Flood Insurance 'Modernization' Bill Boosts Borrowing, Maximum Limits

National News • March 27, 2007
U.S. Reps. Judy Biggert, R-Ill., and Barney Frank, D-Mass., introduced bipartisan legislation to revamp the National Flood Insurance Program that boosts the program's borrowing authority to $21.5 ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Higher Benefits won't Help - if

Posted On: March 29, 2007, 3:55 pm CDT
Posted By: dh
Comment:
If the insured can't get the basic benefits provided in the policy because of the different interpretations of what the policy does or doesn't pay for. The policy as given to the insured lists some items explicitly. But many things are not spelled out, like kitchen cabinets, how much of the wall will be paid for - replace 2-3-4 ft. If they only pay to replace 3 ft up - they also only to paint 3 ft up. That's a very uneven looking wall in the end. If that's the way a policyowner is going to be re-imbursed - this needs to be spelled out in the policy. At the moment - we don't get this knowledge until a claim is filed and we then have to take the adjusters word for it. It's an the unwritten side of the policy.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: appraisals Evan
Apr 2, 2007, 11:07 am
appraisals LL
Mar 30, 2007, 7:58 pm
RE: RE: Higher Benefits won't Help - if Evan
Mar 30, 2007, 7:50 am
RE: Higher Benefits won't Help - if adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 4:37 pm
Higher Benefits won't Help - if dh
Mar 29, 2007, 3:55 pm
Thank you adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 8:24 am
no appraisal needed LL
Mar 28, 2007, 10:29 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject KAT
Mar 28, 2007, 1:58 pm
RE: RE: Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:39 pm
RE: Back to the Original Subject KAT
Mar 28, 2007, 1:28 pm
RE: second home owners again take a beating! adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:14 pm
Back to the Original Subject adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 11:07 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Ba adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 11:04 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Id Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 10:57 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:40 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 10:24 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:15 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 10:12 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 9:59 am
Let us examine adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 9:24 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea djusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:59 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:51 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 8:51 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea DH
Mar 28, 2007, 8:42 am
RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea ML
Mar 28, 2007, 8:39 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 8:35 am
RE: RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 28, 2007, 8:11 am
RE: Annual Report... adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 7:43 am
Annual Report... DDT
Mar 28, 2007, 7:09 am
RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 5:12 pm
RE: Premiums adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 4:55 pm
Premiums Andrew
Mar 27, 2007, 4:45 pm
RE: RE: Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 4:02 pm
stricter building codes needed Mike
Mar 27, 2007, 3:58 pm
second home owners again take a beating! don Hester
Mar 27, 2007, 3:54 pm
RE: Extremely Bad Idea Linda
Mar 27, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: Extremely Bad Idea Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 3:09 pm
Extremely Bad Idea adjusterjoe
Mar 27, 2007, 2:47 pm
RE: flood losses Linda
Mar 27, 2007, 1:51 pm
flood losses Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 1:12 pm
RE: skeptical Nan
Mar 27, 2007, 1:06 pm
skeptical Compman
Mar 27, 2007, 12:33 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.