National News

Viewing comments for:

Survey: 75% of Consumers Satisfied with Insurance Agents; Prefer Personalized Service

National News • May 22, 2007
Three-quarters of consumers are very satisfied with the service provided by their insurance agents and remain committed to working with them in the future, according to a new survey of 1,000 ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: It is

Posted On: May 22, 2007, 4:52 pm CDT
Posted By: bill schneider
Comment:
Adjusterjoe brings to light, once again, the continuing saga of 'know it all adjuster' and the so-called 'professional ins agent'. Is there any agent out there who has had a client come to the agency after speaking with an adjuster and saying, "The adjuster said that the agent should have explained the policy from the first page to the last one to me. If the agent had done that, I should have known what's covered and excluded". Adjusterjoe, however, has undergone extensive training learning the policy at various policy schools where various situations were presented to him and then had to pass an exam over coverage questions. The agent in the meantime is told to 'not get involved in the claims process beyond reporting a loss'. Satisfied customers are those that both agent and adjuster act as business professionals with the customer at the moment of truth...a claims event. For example: Client purchases a Brand New Vehicle. Agent endorses the auto policy and informs the client about "gap" insurance. Client rejects it. Client has a total loss. Adjuster offers ACV based on clearinghouse values, newspapers, dealer quotes, deprecitation, deductibles...valued at $7,000 less than Lienholder amount on the vehicle. Adjuster, short of calling the client 'stupid' says, "Well, didn't your agent explain to you about how we go about determining ACV, etc., etc., .... Any wonder what ADJUSTERJOE thinks as he does!!
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't RAL
May 25, 2007, 3:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't Jewel
May 25, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like steve
May 25, 2007, 3:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jew Jewel
May 25, 2007, 3:07 pm
RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel steve
May 25, 2007, 3:04 pm
RE: laugh out loud Mary B.
May 25, 2007, 2:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: My preference Mary B.
May 25, 2007, 2:40 pm
RE: And now... Rosie/Jewel Fan
May 23, 2007, 5:58 pm
RE: I interviewed a bright young lady who worked at Pemco... Mark
May 23, 2007, 2:53 pm
I interviewed a bright young lady who worked at Pemco... Gill Fin
May 23, 2007, 2:38 pm
RE: RE: And now... Jewel
May 23, 2007, 2:31 pm
RE: And now... Courtney
May 23, 2007, 2:22 pm
And now... Jewel
May 23, 2007, 2:12 pm
RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel adjusterjoe
May 23, 2007, 1:45 pm
RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel Tooten Horn
May 23, 2007, 1:37 pm
RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel adjusterjoe
May 23, 2007, 1:03 pm
P.S. Courtney Jewel
May 23, 2007, 1:03 pm
RE: RE: Completely irrelevent but why I don't care... Jewel
May 23, 2007, 1:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: It is adjusterjoe
May 23, 2007, 12:56 pm
RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel Jewel
May 23, 2007, 12:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: It is bill schneider
May 23, 2007, 12:30 pm
Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel Courtney
May 23, 2007, 12:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: It is Tried Direct
May 23, 2007, 12:01 pm
RE: Voice Mail RAL
May 23, 2007, 11:27 am
RE: Voice Mail Courtney
May 23, 2007, 11:21 am
RE: RE: It is adjusterjoe
May 23, 2007, 11:18 am
Voice Mail Super Agent
May 23, 2007, 10:57 am
RE: Who was polled Mark
May 23, 2007, 9:46 am
One and the same? I think so... Jewel
May 23, 2007, 8:52 am
Who was polled JGD
May 23, 2007, 7:26 am
RE: RE: It is Direct
May 23, 2007, 6:42 am
RE: It is bill schneider
May 22, 2007, 6:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: laugh out loud j
May 22, 2007, 5:53 pm
RE: RE: laugh out loud Laugh Out Loud
May 22, 2007, 5:40 pm
RE: laugh out loud adjusterjoe
May 22, 2007, 5:36 pm
laugh out loud adjusterjoe
May 22, 2007, 5:34 pm
RAL adjusterjoe
May 22, 2007, 5:32 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: It is Laugh Out Loud
May 22, 2007, 5:32 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: It is adjusterjoe
May 22, 2007, 5:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: It is bill schneidera
May 22, 2007, 5:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: It is RAL
May 22, 2007, 5:11 pm
RE: RE: It is adjusterjoe
May 22, 2007, 4:59 pm
RE: It is bill schneider
May 22, 2007, 4:52 pm
Talk adjusterjoe
May 22, 2007, 4:51 pm
RE: RE: RE: It is D. Holloway
May 22, 2007, 4:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: It is Nan
May 22, 2007, 4:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: It is Laugh Out Loud
May 22, 2007, 4:11 pm
RE: RE: It is Tooten Horn
May 22, 2007, 3:58 pm
RE: RE: It is Laugh Out Loud
May 22, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: It is Tooten Horn
May 22, 2007, 2:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: My preference Touche
May 22, 2007, 2:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: My preference j
May 22, 2007, 1:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: My preference JustUWait
May 22, 2007, 1:24 pm
RE: It is Nan
May 22, 2007, 1:11 pm
RE: RE: My preference J
May 22, 2007, 1:04 pm
RE: My preference Joeshmoe
May 22, 2007, 12:48 pm
My preference Rick
May 22, 2007, 12:05 pm
It is adjusterjoe
May 22, 2007, 10:41 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.