National News
Viewing comments for:
Survey: 75% of Consumers Satisfied with Insurance Agents; Prefer Personalized Service
National News May 22, 2007
Three-quarters of consumers are very satisfied with the service provided by their insurance agents and remain committed to working with them in the future, according to a new survey of 1,000 ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't | RAL | May 25, 2007, 3:18 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't | Jewel | May 25, 2007, 3:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like | steve | May 25, 2007, 3:10 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jew | Jewel | May 25, 2007, 3:07 pm |
| RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel | steve | May 25, 2007, 3:04 pm |
| RE: laugh out loud | Mary B. | May 25, 2007, 2:54 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: My preference | Mary B. | May 25, 2007, 2:40 pm |
| RE: And now... | Rosie/Jewel Fan | May 23, 2007, 5:58 pm |
| RE: I interviewed a bright young lady who worked at Pemco... | Mark | May 23, 2007, 2:53 pm |
| I interviewed a bright young lady who worked at Pemco... | Gill Fin | May 23, 2007, 2:38 pm |
| RE: RE: And now... | Jewel | May 23, 2007, 2:31 pm |
| RE: And now... | Courtney | May 23, 2007, 2:22 pm |
| And now... | Jewel | May 23, 2007, 2:12 pm |
| RE: RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel | adjusterjoe | May 23, 2007, 1:45 pm |
| RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel | Tooten Horn | May 23, 2007, 1:37 pm |
| RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel | adjusterjoe | May 23, 2007, 1:03 pm |
| P.S. Courtney | Jewel | May 23, 2007, 1:03 pm |
| RE: RE: Completely irrelevent but why I don't care... | Jewel | May 23, 2007, 1:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: It is | adjusterjoe | May 23, 2007, 12:56 pm |
| RE: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel | Jewel | May 23, 2007, 12:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: It is | bill schneider | May 23, 2007, 12:30 pm |
| Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel | Courtney | May 23, 2007, 12:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: It is | Tried Direct | May 23, 2007, 12:01 pm |
| RE: Voice Mail | RAL | May 23, 2007, 11:27 am |
| RE: Voice Mail | Courtney | May 23, 2007, 11:21 am |
| RE: RE: It is | adjusterjoe | May 23, 2007, 11:18 am |
| Voice Mail | Super Agent | May 23, 2007, 10:57 am |
| RE: Who was polled | Mark | May 23, 2007, 9:46 am |
| One and the same? I think so... | Jewel | May 23, 2007, 8:52 am |
| Who was polled | JGD | May 23, 2007, 7:26 am |
| RE: RE: It is | Direct | May 23, 2007, 6:42 am |
| RE: It is | bill schneider | May 22, 2007, 6:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: laugh out loud | j | May 22, 2007, 5:53 pm |
| RE: RE: laugh out loud | Laugh Out Loud | May 22, 2007, 5:40 pm |
| RE: laugh out loud | adjusterjoe | May 22, 2007, 5:36 pm |
| laugh out loud | adjusterjoe | May 22, 2007, 5:34 pm |
| RAL | adjusterjoe | May 22, 2007, 5:32 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: It is | Laugh Out Loud | May 22, 2007, 5:32 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: It is | adjusterjoe | May 22, 2007, 5:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: It is | bill schneidera | May 22, 2007, 5:19 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: It is | RAL | May 22, 2007, 5:11 pm |
| RE: RE: It is | adjusterjoe | May 22, 2007, 4:59 pm |
| RE: It is | bill schneider | May 22, 2007, 4:52 pm |
| Talk | adjusterjoe | May 22, 2007, 4:51 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: It is | D. Holloway | May 22, 2007, 4:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: It is | Nan | May 22, 2007, 4:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: It is | Laugh Out Loud | May 22, 2007, 4:11 pm |
| RE: RE: It is | Tooten Horn | May 22, 2007, 3:58 pm |
| RE: RE: It is | Laugh Out Loud | May 22, 2007, 3:15 pm |
| RE: It is | Tooten Horn | May 22, 2007, 2:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: My preference | Touche | May 22, 2007, 2:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: My preference | j | May 22, 2007, 1:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: My preference | JustUWait | May 22, 2007, 1:24 pm |
| RE: It is | Nan | May 22, 2007, 1:11 pm |
| RE: RE: My preference | J | May 22, 2007, 1:04 pm |
| RE: My preference | Joeshmoe | May 22, 2007, 12:48 pm |
| My preference | Rick | May 22, 2007, 12:05 pm |
| It is | adjusterjoe | May 22, 2007, 10:41 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Completely Irrelevant, but why I don't like Jewel
Second, I do not dispute Jewel's intelligence. I've asked her for clarification on articles before and she has been most helpful.
But what irks me about her is this...she reminds me of the people Daniel Quinn and Any Rand write about in those books. She is an "other," a "second hand thinker." Very rarely does she have a thought on her own. She waits for other people to type and then attacks them for their grammar, for their incoherent typing (which isn't one of the points of this site is just to have a quick, knee-jerk reaction?)
On one particular thread some time ago, she attacked what I was saying and I was so confused by what she was questioning, I simply gave up. Because, most importantly, I could care less if you agree with me or enjoy what I'm typing. This is a post for opinions. And I, just like you, are entitled to mine.
Now, when I come to this website looking for further opinions on a subject, I have to read asinine posts about how adjusterjoe must have 8 different identities. I pose this question in a Jewel style format...."how do you know they are one in the same? is the grammar style the same, spelling errors the same, thought process the same???" oh wait, you know what? who cares? NO ONE!
Bottom line, if Jewel could just engage in her own thoughts and leave it at that, I think her posts would be great, relevant, even thought provoking. But instead she belittles herself and readers around here by attacking others and simply sucking thoughts off of everyone else. I would much rather be a creator than a critic!
And that's why I don't like Jewel.
Besides who gives a $hit if anyone knows you on Insurance Journal dot com.