National News
Viewing comments for:
FTC Finds Use of Credit Helps Consumers, Insurer Group Says
National News July 20, 2007
The Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) study of automobile insurers' use of credit has reaffirmed the strong connection between credit information and the risk of loss and has determined that its ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: FAIR?! | jc | Jul 30, 2007, 2:04 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: FAIR?! | Nobody Important | Jul 26, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: FAIR?! | JC | Jul 26, 2007, 3:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: FAIR?! | Nobody Important | Jul 26, 2007, 2:31 pm |
| RE: FAIR?! | wudchuck | Jul 26, 2007, 12:13 pm |
| RE: RE: FAIR?! | JC | Jul 26, 2007, 9:59 am |
| RE: FAIR?! | Nobody Important | Jul 25, 2007, 9:57 pm |
| FAIR?! | wudchuck | Jul 23, 2007, 4:28 pm |
| RE: RE: FTC | Stat Guy | Jul 23, 2007, 2:40 pm |
| The Good - The Bad | DWT | Jul 23, 2007, 1:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: FTC | TruthBeTold | Jul 23, 2007, 12:24 pm |
| RE: RE: FTC | NTXCoog | Jul 23, 2007, 11:49 am |
| RE: RE: RE: FTC | CB | Jul 23, 2007, 10:47 am |
| Question... | Nebraskan | Jul 23, 2007, 9:34 am |
| really hurt | Jul 23, 2007, 9:09 am |
|
| The Federal Trade Commission's -COMPLICITY | SOMETHING THAT PROTECTS | Jul 23, 2007, 9:06 am |
| who does credit scoring really hurt | roundtable | Jul 23, 2007, 9:02 am |
| RE: RE: FTC | Noboby Important | Jul 22, 2007, 6:22 pm |
| RE: FTC | wudchuck | Jul 22, 2007, 6:15 am |
| RE: RE: RE: FTC | Noboby Important | Jul 21, 2007, 9:37 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: FTC | Noboby Important | Jul 21, 2007, 9:33 pm |
| RE: RE: FTC | CB | Jul 21, 2007, 8:46 pm |
| RE: FTC | wudchuck | Jul 21, 2007, 7:45 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: FTC | CB | Jul 20, 2007, 7:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: FTC | NTXCoog | Jul 20, 2007, 4:01 pm |
| RE: credit scoring for auto insurance | NTXCoog | Jul 20, 2007, 3:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: FTC | A FRIEND | Jul 20, 2007, 3:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: FTC | Nobody Important | Jul 20, 2007, 3:09 pm |
| RE: RE: FTC | CB | Jul 20, 2007, 2:33 pm |
| RE: FTC | Nobody Important | Jul 20, 2007, 2:24 pm |
| RE: credit scoring for auto insurance | JB | Jul 20, 2007, 2:23 pm |
| RE: FTC | JB | Jul 20, 2007, 2:18 pm |
| credit scoring for auto insurance | chuck baker | Jul 20, 2007, 1:57 pm |
| FTC | Peter Polstein | Jul 20, 2007, 1:43 pm |
| FTC | Peter Polstein | Jul 20, 2007, 1:43 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: credit scoring for auto insurance
I need help with how to explain our rate determination methodology to my customers here in Arkansas.
Upon renewal, even though the majority are receiving our 30/60, ultra preferred, and super preferred discounts for safe driving and no accidents, citations or claims in the past 3 to 5 years their premiums are increasing by from 10% to 45%.
Nearly all of my customers foolishly believe that auto premiums are determined primarily by their driving record and partially by the type vehicle they drive.
I am aware that according to the "studies" people with what Insurance Companies have determined to be bad "Insurance Scores" are much more likely to file claims than those with "good" credit scores. Now, looking at my second paragraph above the facts do not appear to support the "studies". Additionally, from what we are allowed to see of the reasons for some the negatives in the risk assessment process I don't believe that some of the negatives are valid in the real world but some appear to be very valid. I have customers we show as having a very bad score making them an insurance risk yet they are to lending institutions acceptable customers. Who has the most risk?????
Anyway, the bottom line is look at the second paragraph. Those are the people I need to be able to provide some logical explanation to for their rate increase because of their propensity to file claims when they have not filed claims in the past 3 to 5 years.