National News

Viewing comments for:

Insurers Balk as House Panel Votes to Add Wind Coverage to Flood Program

National News • July 27, 2007
Private insurance companies are balking at a decision by a key House panel to expand the federal flood insurance program to include wind coverage. The House Financial Services Committee voted ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: The Real Reason.. To Broker & FLA Agent

Posted On: August 2, 2007, 7:13 am CDT
Posted By: Fla. Agent
Comment:
Your situation is validation of the "I'm from the governmant and I'm here to help."

It was reported yesterday that Citizens had recently closed some 1,000 claims from the '04 & '05 storm seasons. Not to mention the fact that Citizens failed miserably in '04 & '05 - which led to a major restructuring of the program and some personnel. It was in all the papers.

One question: Why didn't you take advantage of the mediation process the State implemented after the '04 season?

I know of several companies that paid their wind claims fairly and equitably.
If you attended any of Commissioner Gallagher's town hall meetings after the '04 season, the majority of the consumer complaints were about many of the same carriers whose names are associated with the post Katrina fall-out in the gulf states.

For the record, redlining is a practice of socio-economic discrimination. Availability (or the lack there of)through the private market was due to carriers having reached their capacity in your area, as well as issues with sink holes. Every sink hole claim is a $5,oo0 to $8,000 hit just to bring in engineers and soil experts to determine whether the claim is valid or not. And more imes than not, the problem was settlement of the foundation / slab. Not a gaping hole in the ground. So your lack of market availability was compounded by your greedy neighbors and trial lawyers, looking to make a fast buck off their insurance carriers.

Given your former location (I suspect either Pasco or Hernando Counties)and the minimal wind impact in that area from Hurricane Charley, the failure of your roof was in all likelyhood due to poor workmanship and/or materials. You mention that your home was two years old. Was it constructed under the Florida Building Code? If so, you shouldn't have had any problems - if it was properly constructed.

To denegrate an entire industry because of your experience with an underfunded and poorly managed state run program indicates (to me) that while you may consider yourself informed / educated on the issue, your comments simply validates the old addage, "A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing." I will conceed that you are indeed a "dangerous" consumer.

Sorry about your loss.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: The Other Side Of The Story Broker
Aug 3, 2007, 2:30 pm
RE: RE: The Other Side Of The Story Barb Polsky
Aug 3, 2007, 12:06 pm
RE: The Other Side Of The Story Broker
Aug 2, 2007, 11:19 am
The Other Side Of The Story Barb Polsky
Aug 2, 2007, 9:08 am
RE: RE: The Real Reason.. To Broker & FLA Agent Broker
Aug 2, 2007, 9:00 am
RE: RE: RE: The Real Reason.. To Broker & FLA Agent Tom
Aug 2, 2007, 7:58 am
RE: RE: The Real Reason.. To Broker & FLA Agent Fla. Agent
Aug 2, 2007, 7:13 am
RE: The Real Reason.. To Broker & FLA Agent Harold Polsky
Aug 1, 2007, 7:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Real Reason The Industry Doesn't Fla. Agent
Aug 1, 2007, 1:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Real Reason The Industry Doesn't Lik Broker
Aug 1, 2007, 8:33 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: The Real Reason The Industry Doesn't Like Th Harold Polsky
Aug 1, 2007, 8:08 am
FL home insurance calypso
Jul 31, 2007, 1:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: The Real Reason The Industry Doesn't Like This Mark
Jul 31, 2007, 1:13 pm
RE: FL home insurance Fla. Agent
Jul 31, 2007, 11:42 am
Wind Deductibles of 1-10 eliminate most wind exposure Jane Logan
Jul 31, 2007, 8:05 am
RE: RE: The Real Reason The Industry Doesn't Like This Harold Polsky
Jul 30, 2007, 8:11 pm
RE: RE: Nobody Important Nobody Important
Jul 30, 2007, 7:04 pm
RE: Nobody Important Nobody Important
Jul 30, 2007, 6:57 pm
FL home insurance calypso
Jul 30, 2007, 3:18 pm
RE: RE: Wind Coverage tom
Jul 30, 2007, 12:50 pm
RE: NFIP WIND coverage Tom
Jul 30, 2007, 12:48 pm
RE: The Real Reason The Industry Doesn't Like This Dave
Jul 30, 2007, 11:36 am
RE: RE: Wind Coverage ROOF ROOF
Jul 30, 2007, 11:01 am
RE: Wind Coverage DWT
Jul 30, 2007, 10:47 am
"Carrier's" obsesrvation is right on! Fla. Agent.
Jul 30, 2007, 10:02 am
Wind Coverage Gene Corvino
Jul 30, 2007, 9:38 am
RE: Nobody Important Carrier
Jul 30, 2007, 8:27 am
RE: Final Solution NOT AN AGENT!
Jul 27, 2007, 9:08 pm
Final Solution Nobody Important
Jul 27, 2007, 8:37 pm
RE: No one expects the Gov to pay for wind coverage Nobody Important
Jul 27, 2007, 8:25 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Federal Govt Wind Nobody Important
Jul 27, 2007, 8:22 pm
RE: RE: Gill Fin what are you talking about?! Nobody Important
Jul 27, 2007, 8:06 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Federal Govt Wind memo from turner
Jul 27, 2007, 8:04 pm
RE: Insurance is supposed to ease, not cause burden NOT AN AGENT!
Jul 27, 2007, 7:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: Re: Federal Govt Wind NOT AN AGENT!
Jul 27, 2007, 7:10 pm
RE: RE: Let's Cut the Crap Kathy
Jul 27, 2007, 7:08 pm
RE: Let's Cut the Crap Kathy
Jul 27, 2007, 7:07 pm
RE: Just Say No Kathy
Jul 27, 2007, 6:40 pm
Asbestos Tort Reform is an example of hidden subsidies Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 6:26 pm
RE: Gill Fin what are you talking about?! Gill Fin
Jul 27, 2007, 6:05 pm
Insurance is supposed to ease, not cause burden Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 6:03 pm
RE: RE: I forgot about the Flood vs Wind coverage issues Been There
Jul 27, 2007, 5:52 pm
Gill Fin what are you talking about?! Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 5:48 pm
RE: RE: Re: Federal Govt Wind Gill Fin
Jul 27, 2007, 5:39 pm
RE: Re: Federal Govt Wind NOT AN AGENT!
Jul 27, 2007, 5:22 pm
RE: I forgot about the Flood vs Wind coverage issues Kathy
Jul 27, 2007, 5:20 pm
RE: More spin than a Cat 5 Hurricane Kathy
Jul 27, 2007, 5:19 pm
Thank God! Thank God!
Jul 27, 2007, 5:17 pm
Reading comprehension skills need improvement Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 4:37 pm
Subsidizing DG
Jul 27, 2007, 4:29 pm
RE: Lumpit must live in the one safe place... Lumpit
Jul 27, 2007, 4:23 pm
RE: Wind/Flood Realist
Jul 27, 2007, 4:17 pm
Lumpit must live in the one safe place... Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 4:00 pm
RE: Wind/Flood Lumpit
Jul 27, 2007, 3:55 pm
Cross subsidies Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 3:19 pm
Wind/Flood Tinkerbell
Jul 27, 2007, 3:16 pm
RE: Cape Cod is not Hurricane Alley Gill Fin
Jul 27, 2007, 3:10 pm
Cape Cod is not Hurricane Alley Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 2:56 pm
Jane, we are government. Gill Fin
Jul 27, 2007, 2:43 pm
To: houses of the holy Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 2:32 pm
No one expects the Gov to pay for wind coverage Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 2:30 pm
RE: Building Coes houses of the holy
Jul 27, 2007, 2:25 pm
RE: Are you saying its so easy.... cat ouf of the bag
Jul 27, 2007, 2:21 pm
Typhoons and Typos Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 2:20 pm
RE: Let's Cut the Crap Wags
Jul 27, 2007, 2:18 pm
Building Coes Jane Logan
Jul 27, 2007, 2:17 pm
RE: Re: Federal Govt Wind lord of darkness
Jul 27, 2007, 2:15 pm
Are you saying its so easy.... Gill Fin
Jul 27, 2007, 2:13 pm
Wind & Flood - State Rating Mechanism Broker
Jul 27, 2007, 2:06 pm
Let's Cut the Crap Artie
Jul 27, 2007, 1:52 pm
Just Say No Mark
Jul 27, 2007, 1:42 pm
What Wind Jack
Jul 27, 2007, 1:31 pm
Re: Federal Govt Wind buzzard
Jul 27, 2007, 1:23 pm
RE: Wind coverage and NFIP Peter Polstein
Jul 27, 2007, 1:21 pm
I forgot about the Flood vs Wind coverage issues Jane Logan, CPCU
Jul 27, 2007, 1:16 pm
Wind coverage and NFIP Observer
Jul 27, 2007, 1:09 pm
More spin than a Cat 5 Hurricane Jane Logan, CPCU
Jul 27, 2007, 1:05 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.