National News
Viewing comments for:
Insurers Prepared for Claims from Fatal Minneapolis Bridge Collapse
National News • August 3, 2007
The insurance industry is vowing to take care of any claims arising out of the Minneapolis bridge collapse tragedy without delay.
"There will be no exclusions - it will all be coverable. The ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| To The Breeze | PR Slut | Aug 10, 2007, 2:42 pm |
| tragedy in MN | clm mgr | Aug 6, 2007, 2:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | Mary B. | Aug 6, 2007, 1:25 pm |
| Not a Federal issue? | Jones Tater | Aug 6, 2007, 1:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Question for Doug | CA | Aug 6, 2007, 1:19 pm |
| RE: RE: INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING | RAL | Aug 6, 2007, 11:46 am |
| RE: INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING | philip Bracco | Aug 6, 2007, 11:40 am |
| RE: For | From MN | Aug 6, 2007, 11:24 am |
| RE: Dumb statement | America First | Aug 6, 2007, 10:43 am |
| Dumb statement | NG | Aug 6, 2007, 10:39 am |
| For "From MN" | RAL | Aug 6, 2007, 10:33 am |
| RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | Anon | Aug 6, 2007, 8:34 am |
| What will be our next priority? | dwt | Aug 6, 2007, 8:32 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Question for Doug | fen | Aug 6, 2007, 6:55 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Question for Doug | fen | Aug 6, 2007, 6:54 am |
| Bush | PYM | Aug 4, 2007, 10:10 pm |
| Not really a relevant correlation, Revolution | Gill Fin | Aug 4, 2007, 1:31 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | RAL | Aug 3, 2007, 5:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | Revolution | Aug 3, 2007, 5:17 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | OK, second world? | Aug 3, 2007, 5:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | RAL | Aug 3, 2007, 5:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 4:58 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | RAL | Aug 3, 2007, 4:45 pm |
| Doing Research | Totally Random Question | Aug 3, 2007, 4:31 pm |
| RE: RE: Checking Bridges | Are we so different? | Aug 3, 2007, 4:29 pm |
| RE: Checking Bridges | Amazed... | Aug 3, 2007, 4:10 pm |
| Checking Bridges | Insane | Aug 3, 2007, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | RAL | Aug 3, 2007, 3:51 pm |
| RE: RE: It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks | The Breeze | Aug 3, 2007, 3:51 pm |
| RE: It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | Curious | Aug 3, 2007, 3:45 pm |
| It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks | The Breeze | Aug 3, 2007, 3:43 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:42 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | The Donald | Aug 3, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| RE: RE: Question for Doug | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | Reality check | Aug 3, 2007, 3:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| RE: Question for Doug | Curious | Aug 3, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| oh and BTW | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:31 pm |
| RE: RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? | Doug Phresh | Aug 3, 2007, 3:29 pm |
| RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? | Nobody Important | Aug 3, 2007, 3:26 pm |
| Question for Doug | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:24 pm |
| How is this NOT a political Issue? | Doug Phresh | Aug 3, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| One more thing, media mogul | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:08 pm |
| RE: RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutti | Mark | Aug 3, 2007, 3:06 pm |
| Bridge Disaster | Peter Polstein | Aug 3, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | Thinker | Aug 3, 2007, 2:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | Just saying... | Aug 3, 2007, 2:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | Bill Reed | Aug 3, 2007, 1:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | plymn | Aug 3, 2007, 1:53 pm |
| RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | just saying... | Aug 3, 2007, 1:39 pm |
| RE: Thanks for the replies | Plymn | Aug 3, 2007, 1:38 pm |
| Thanks for the replies | media mogul | Aug 3, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| RE: RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutti | Compman | Aug 3, 2007, 1:12 pm |
| RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | Plymn | Aug 3, 2007, 1:08 pm |
| RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 1:08 pm |
| RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | HawaiiDuke888 | Aug 3, 2007, 1:05 pm |
| Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | media mogul | Aug 3, 2007, 12:50 pm |
| RE: RE: | HawaiiDuke888 | Aug 3, 2007, 12:49 pm |
| RE: RE: I AGREE | Also in shock | Aug 3, 2007, 12:47 pm |
| Who's fault? | Tarheel | Aug 3, 2007, 12:46 pm |
| RE: | MMM | Aug 3, 2007, 12:01 pm |
| "There will be no exclusions – it will all be coverable" | Wild Bill Kelso | Aug 3, 2007, 11:45 am |
| INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING | Paul J | Aug 3, 2007, 11:20 am |
| Aging structures | CONCERNED | Aug 3, 2007, 10:36 am |
| Tragedy In Minn | Katmandu | Aug 3, 2007, 10:31 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: