National News
Viewing comments for:
Insurers Prepared for Claims from Fatal Minneapolis Bridge Collapse
National News • August 3, 2007
The insurance industry is vowing to take care of any claims arising out of the Minneapolis bridge collapse tragedy without delay.
"There will be no exclusions - it will all be coverable. The ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| To The Breeze | PR Slut | Aug 10, 2007, 2:42 pm |
| tragedy in MN | clm mgr | Aug 6, 2007, 2:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | Mary B. | Aug 6, 2007, 1:25 pm |
| Not a Federal issue? | Jones Tater | Aug 6, 2007, 1:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Question for Doug | CA | Aug 6, 2007, 1:19 pm |
| RE: RE: INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING | RAL | Aug 6, 2007, 11:46 am |
| RE: INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING | philip Bracco | Aug 6, 2007, 11:40 am |
| RE: For | From MN | Aug 6, 2007, 11:24 am |
| RE: Dumb statement | America First | Aug 6, 2007, 10:43 am |
| Dumb statement | NG | Aug 6, 2007, 10:39 am |
| For "From MN" | RAL | Aug 6, 2007, 10:33 am |
| RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | Anon | Aug 6, 2007, 8:34 am |
| What will be our next priority? | dwt | Aug 6, 2007, 8:32 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Question for Doug | fen | Aug 6, 2007, 6:55 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Question for Doug | fen | Aug 6, 2007, 6:54 am |
| Bush | PYM | Aug 4, 2007, 10:10 pm |
| Not really a relevant correlation, Revolution | Gill Fin | Aug 4, 2007, 1:31 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | RAL | Aug 3, 2007, 5:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | Revolution | Aug 3, 2007, 5:17 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | OK, second world? | Aug 3, 2007, 5:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | RAL | Aug 3, 2007, 5:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 4:58 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges | RAL | Aug 3, 2007, 4:45 pm |
| Doing Research | Totally Random Question | Aug 3, 2007, 4:31 pm |
| RE: RE: Checking Bridges | Are we so different? | Aug 3, 2007, 4:29 pm |
| RE: Checking Bridges | Amazed... | Aug 3, 2007, 4:10 pm |
| Checking Bridges | Insane | Aug 3, 2007, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | RAL | Aug 3, 2007, 3:51 pm |
| RE: RE: It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks | The Breeze | Aug 3, 2007, 3:51 pm |
| RE: It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | Curious | Aug 3, 2007, 3:45 pm |
| It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks | The Breeze | Aug 3, 2007, 3:43 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:42 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | The Donald | Aug 3, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| RE: RE: Question for Doug | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check | Reality check | Aug 3, 2007, 3:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| RE: Question for Doug | Curious | Aug 3, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| oh and BTW | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:31 pm |
| RE: RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? | Doug Phresh | Aug 3, 2007, 3:29 pm |
| RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? | Nobody Important | Aug 3, 2007, 3:26 pm |
| Question for Doug | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:24 pm |
| How is this NOT a political Issue? | Doug Phresh | Aug 3, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| One more thing, media mogul | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:08 pm |
| RE: RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutti | Mark | Aug 3, 2007, 3:06 pm |
| Bridge Disaster | Peter Polstein | Aug 3, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 3:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | Thinker | Aug 3, 2007, 2:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | Just saying... | Aug 3, 2007, 2:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | Bill Reed | Aug 3, 2007, 1:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | plymn | Aug 3, 2007, 1:53 pm |
| RE: RE: Thanks for the replies | just saying... | Aug 3, 2007, 1:39 pm |
| RE: Thanks for the replies | Plymn | Aug 3, 2007, 1:38 pm |
| Thanks for the replies | media mogul | Aug 3, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| RE: RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutti | Compman | Aug 3, 2007, 1:12 pm |
| RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | Plymn | Aug 3, 2007, 1:08 pm |
| RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | From MN | Aug 3, 2007, 1:08 pm |
| RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | HawaiiDuke888 | Aug 3, 2007, 1:05 pm |
| Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting | media mogul | Aug 3, 2007, 12:50 pm |
| RE: RE: | HawaiiDuke888 | Aug 3, 2007, 12:49 pm |
| RE: RE: I AGREE | Also in shock | Aug 3, 2007, 12:47 pm |
| Who's fault? | Tarheel | Aug 3, 2007, 12:46 pm |
| RE: | MMM | Aug 3, 2007, 12:01 pm |
| "There will be no exclusions – it will all be coverable" | Wild Bill Kelso | Aug 3, 2007, 11:45 am |
| INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING | Paul J | Aug 3, 2007, 11:20 am |
| Aging structures | CONCERNED | Aug 3, 2007, 10:36 am |
| Tragedy In Minn | Katmandu | Aug 3, 2007, 10:31 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: Thanks for the replies
These are of course mere insurance workers--not the A team--that's why they're in insurance to begin with, no? So maybe there is still hope in the general population, instead of this discourse of endless carping, "me first" and no solutions possible.
Did we say no money vs. terrorists, etc.? Once again an attempt to distract with foregin devils--just like Fox News.
You're trying to score cheap points instead of taking effective action. Go back to your DVDs, Simpsons and ice cream (mmm...ice cream) and have a good weekend. Maybe the rest of us will try to accomplish something.