National News

Viewing comments for:

Insurers Prepared for Claims from Fatal Minneapolis Bridge Collapse

National News • August 3, 2007
The insurance industry is vowing to take care of any claims arising out of the Minneapolis bridge collapse tragedy without delay. "There will be no exclusions - it will all be coverable. The ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Question for Doug

Posted On: August 3, 2007, 3:24 pm CDT
Posted By: From MN
Comment:
Doug, before you offer your advice on the Iraq/Terrorism issue, please give us your credentials, such as:
1) How many times have you been to Iraq
2) What government intelligence agencies are you / have you been employed with
3) Whether or not you are potty-trained
4) How often you have taken attendance of entire population of the world and determined there are no terrorists

If you do not have credentials, then please learn how to wipe your butt yourself and don't speak on an issue you know nothing about. The United States is a democracy. Since they probably didn't cover that where you went to school, that is where the majority vote elects persons to make decisions for country.

I suppose we should not have stepped in to fight Hitler either, and just have forgiven Japan for bombing us?

Take your buddy media mogul and move to a different country please.
Subject Posted By Posted On
To The Breeze PR Slut
Aug 10, 2007, 2:42 pm
tragedy in MN clm mgr
Aug 6, 2007, 2:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges Mary B.
Aug 6, 2007, 1:25 pm
Not a Federal issue? Jones Tater
Aug 6, 2007, 1:20 pm
RE: RE: Question for Doug CA
Aug 6, 2007, 1:19 pm
RE: RE: INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING RAL
Aug 6, 2007, 11:46 am
RE: INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING philip Bracco
Aug 6, 2007, 11:40 am
RE: For From MN
Aug 6, 2007, 11:24 am
RE: Dumb statement America First
Aug 6, 2007, 10:43 am
Dumb statement NG
Aug 6, 2007, 10:39 am
For "From MN" RAL
Aug 6, 2007, 10:33 am
RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting Anon
Aug 6, 2007, 8:34 am
What will be our next priority? dwt
Aug 6, 2007, 8:32 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Question for Doug fen
Aug 6, 2007, 6:55 am
RE: RE: RE: Question for Doug fen
Aug 6, 2007, 6:54 am
Bush PYM
Aug 4, 2007, 10:10 pm
Not really a relevant correlation, Revolution Gill Fin
Aug 4, 2007, 1:31 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges RAL
Aug 3, 2007, 5:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges Revolution
Aug 3, 2007, 5:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges OK, second world?
Aug 3, 2007, 5:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges RAL
Aug 3, 2007, 5:14 pm
RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 4:58 pm
RE: RE: RE: Checking Bridges RAL
Aug 3, 2007, 4:45 pm
Doing Research Totally Random Question
Aug 3, 2007, 4:31 pm
RE: RE: Checking Bridges Are we so different?
Aug 3, 2007, 4:29 pm
RE: Checking Bridges Amazed...
Aug 3, 2007, 4:10 pm
Checking Bridges Insane
Aug 3, 2007, 4:07 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check RAL
Aug 3, 2007, 3:51 pm
RE: RE: It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks The Breeze
Aug 3, 2007, 3:51 pm
RE: It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 3:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check Curious
Aug 3, 2007, 3:45 pm
It IS a political issue, but not like Doug thinks The Breeze
Aug 3, 2007, 3:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 3:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check The Donald
Aug 3, 2007, 3:38 pm
RE: RE: Question for Doug From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 3:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Reality check Reality check
Aug 3, 2007, 3:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 3:33 pm
RE: Question for Doug Curious
Aug 3, 2007, 3:33 pm
oh and BTW From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 3:31 pm
RE: RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? Doug Phresh
Aug 3, 2007, 3:29 pm
RE: How is this NOT a political Issue? Nobody Important
Aug 3, 2007, 3:26 pm
Question for Doug From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 3:24 pm
How is this NOT a political Issue? Doug Phresh
Aug 3, 2007, 3:14 pm
One more thing, media mogul From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 3:08 pm
RE: RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutti Mark
Aug 3, 2007, 3:06 pm
Bridge Disaster Peter Polstein
Aug 3, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 3:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies Thinker
Aug 3, 2007, 2:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies Just saying...
Aug 3, 2007, 2:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies Bill Reed
Aug 3, 2007, 1:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: Thanks for the replies plymn
Aug 3, 2007, 1:53 pm
RE: RE: Thanks for the replies just saying...
Aug 3, 2007, 1:39 pm
RE: Thanks for the replies Plymn
Aug 3, 2007, 1:38 pm
Thanks for the replies media mogul
Aug 3, 2007, 1:17 pm
RE: RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutti Compman
Aug 3, 2007, 1:12 pm
RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting Plymn
Aug 3, 2007, 1:08 pm
RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting From MN
Aug 3, 2007, 1:08 pm
RE: Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting HawaiiDuke888
Aug 3, 2007, 1:05 pm
Just one more baleful effect of unstinting tax-cutting media mogul
Aug 3, 2007, 12:50 pm
RE: RE: HawaiiDuke888
Aug 3, 2007, 12:49 pm
RE: RE: I AGREE Also in shock
Aug 3, 2007, 12:47 pm
Who's fault? Tarheel
Aug 3, 2007, 12:46 pm
RE: MMM
Aug 3, 2007, 12:01 pm
"There will be no exclusions – it will all be coverable" Wild Bill Kelso
Aug 3, 2007, 11:45 am
INSURANCE MARKETING REP GLAD TO BE RETIRING Paul J
Aug 3, 2007, 11:20 am
Aging structures CONCERNED
Aug 3, 2007, 10:36 am
Tragedy In Minn Katmandu
Aug 3, 2007, 10:31 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.