National News
Viewing comments for:
House Passes Bill to Create National Registry of Convicted Arsonists
National News December 7, 2007
Two House lawmakers from fire-struck California won approval this week for legislation to set up a national registry to track convicted arsonists.
The bill, which was passed by voice vote, ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Doesn't law enforcement already have access to this info | Dread | Dec 10, 2007, 8:01 am |
| Arson Registry | gary | Dec 9, 2007, 7:17 am |
| Doesn't law enforcement already have access to this info? | KLS | Dec 7, 2007, 4:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Registry of Convicted Arsonists, etc. | lastbat | Dec 7, 2007, 3:05 pm |
| RE: RE: Registry of Convicted Arsonists, etc. | Rick | Dec 7, 2007, 2:03 pm |
| RE: hmmm | Rick | Dec 7, 2007, 2:00 pm |
| RE: Registry of Convicted Arsonists, etc. | Sue | Dec 7, 2007, 1:07 pm |
| Registry of Convicted Arsonists, etc. | Old leftie | Dec 7, 2007, 1:00 pm |
| hmmm | me | Dec 7, 2007, 12:48 pm |
| Oh Great | Rick | Dec 7, 2007, 12:48 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: Doesn't law enforcement already have access to this info?
Should or would such databases be available to the general public? I haven't decided. I can see very solid points both for and against it. If someone has served their sentence for their misdeed, then in the eyes of the law, they're reset back to "normal" in most cases and should be allowed some privacy. However, there are times where I think they should never have a "right" to privacy again, especially with those who have committed crimes against children or sex offenders...
But arson? I think I'd rather have access to a habitual drunk driver database than an arsonist database. Both are dangerous offenses, but one is far more common and probably a much bigger problem than the other.