National News
Viewing comments for:
Study Questions Use of Personality Tests in Hiring Employees
National News December 14, 2007
For the past 15 years personality tests have been thought to be valid predictors of job performance. So much so that and many employers are now using them when selecting workers or making ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Personality Tests - are they misused or are the wrong tests | ffirari | Jan 3, 2008, 11:25 am |
| RE: Maybe employees should be privy supervisors' personaliti | Taz | Dec 26, 2007, 3:52 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Not wanted | Walter Jones | Dec 20, 2007, 10:18 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Not wanted | Nebraskan | Dec 18, 2007, 4:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Not wanted | SouthernBelle | Dec 18, 2007, 1:46 pm |
| Personality Tests | gary | Dec 18, 2007, 12:27 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Not wanted | Dustin | Dec 18, 2007, 10:32 am |
| RE: RE: Not wanted | SouthernBelle | Dec 18, 2007, 10:29 am |
| RE: Maybe employees should be privy supervisors' personaliti | Nebraskan | Dec 17, 2007, 3:53 pm |
| RE: Not wanted | Nebraskan | Dec 17, 2007, 3:51 pm |
| RE: personality tests | Banana | Dec 17, 2007, 2:31 pm |
| personality profiling | SouthernBelle | Dec 17, 2007, 11:55 am |
| I passed | Crazy D | Dec 17, 2007, 11:52 am |
| RE: personality tests | Gbell | Dec 17, 2007, 11:15 am |
| personality tests | Lewis Ambler | Dec 17, 2007, 11:03 am |
| RE: RE: RE: personality tests | Fred | Dec 17, 2007, 8:37 am |
| RE: RE: personality tests | doesnt matter | Dec 15, 2007, 12:22 am |
| RE: Bogus | Mr. Personality | Dec 14, 2007, 3:52 pm |
| Bogus | Dread | Dec 14, 2007, 3:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Personality Tests | Mr. Personality | Dec 14, 2007, 3:04 pm |
| RE: RE: Personality Tests | Ratemaker | Dec 14, 2007, 1:55 pm |
| RE: Personality Tests | Mr. Personality | Dec 14, 2007, 1:47 pm |
| Maybe employees should be privy supervisors' personalities? | KLS | Dec 14, 2007, 1:46 pm |
| RE: RE: Personality Tests | Jimbo | Dec 14, 2007, 1:30 pm |
| RE: Personality Tests | Mr. Obvious | Dec 14, 2007, 1:28 pm |
| Personality Tests | Rich | Dec 14, 2007, 12:38 pm |
| Not wanted | reject | Dec 14, 2007, 11:57 am |
| RE: personality tests | lastbat | Dec 14, 2007, 10:15 am |
| personality tests | Barry M. Gold CAC CSP | Dec 14, 2007, 9:15 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: personality tests
Guess what, I'll bet the turn-over is almost the same for those who test and those who don't.
I believe what a person has done in the past is a good indicator of what he or she will do in the future. How a company does what they do... HAS to compliment how a person does what they do! Companies need to understand this important statement.
Two producers could switch companies and begin to fail, just because of culture differences. What good is it to hire someone used to certain "back-up" or "tools" and expect them to succeed without them?
If a company knows what it takes to succeed at THEIR company...they don't need to do a personality test!
If managers DO NOT WANT TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR DECISIONS, then test! The best managers are always talking to perspective candidates and KNOW what they are looking for.
HR loves to test, why? Because most of them (not all) don't really know your business...now do they? !
But, what about head hunters? You can't trust them? Any headhunter?... then don't use them. It might become a lot harder, but hey, give it a go and rely on tests. Head hunters are like good canidates... you have to find one that knows your business and has the experience to partner with you.