National News

Viewing comments for:

Study Questions Use of Personality Tests in Hiring Employees

National News • December 14, 2007
For the past 15 years personality tests have been thought to be valid predictors of job performance. So much so that and many employers are now using them when selecting workers or making ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: personality tests

Posted On: December 14, 2007, 9:15 am CST
Posted By: Barry M. Gold CAC CSP
Comment:
Great article... Besides referring candidates for almost forty years as a head hunter, I have also been an observer of the hiring practices of hundreds of brokers, nationwide.

Guess what, I'll bet the turn-over is almost the same for those who test and those who don't.

I believe what a person has done in the past is a good indicator of what he or she will do in the future. How a company does what they do... HAS to compliment how a person does what they do! Companies need to understand this important statement.

Two producers could switch companies and begin to fail, just because of culture differences. What good is it to hire someone used to certain "back-up" or "tools" and expect them to succeed without them?

If a company knows what it takes to succeed at THEIR company...they don't need to do a personality test!

If managers DO NOT WANT TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR DECISIONS, then test! The best managers are always talking to perspective candidates and KNOW what they are looking for.

HR loves to test, why? Because most of them (not all) don't really know your business...now do they? !

But, what about head hunters? You can't trust them? Any headhunter?... then don't use them. It might become a lot harder, but hey, give it a go and rely on tests. Head hunters are like good canidates... you have to find one that knows your business and has the experience to partner with you.
Subject Posted By Posted On
Personality Tests - are they misused or are the wrong tests ffirari
Jan 3, 2008, 11:25 am
RE: Maybe employees should be privy supervisors' personaliti Taz
Dec 26, 2007, 3:52 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Not wanted Walter Jones
Dec 20, 2007, 10:18 am
RE: RE: RE: Not wanted Nebraskan
Dec 18, 2007, 4:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Not wanted SouthernBelle
Dec 18, 2007, 1:46 pm
Personality Tests gary
Dec 18, 2007, 12:27 pm
RE: RE: RE: Not wanted Dustin
Dec 18, 2007, 10:32 am
RE: RE: Not wanted SouthernBelle
Dec 18, 2007, 10:29 am
RE: Maybe employees should be privy supervisors' personaliti Nebraskan
Dec 17, 2007, 3:53 pm
RE: Not wanted Nebraskan
Dec 17, 2007, 3:51 pm
RE: personality tests Banana
Dec 17, 2007, 2:31 pm
personality profiling SouthernBelle
Dec 17, 2007, 11:55 am
I passed Crazy D
Dec 17, 2007, 11:52 am
RE: personality tests Gbell
Dec 17, 2007, 11:15 am
personality tests Lewis Ambler
Dec 17, 2007, 11:03 am
RE: RE: RE: personality tests Fred
Dec 17, 2007, 8:37 am
RE: RE: personality tests doesnt matter
Dec 15, 2007, 12:22 am
RE: Bogus Mr. Personality
Dec 14, 2007, 3:52 pm
Bogus Dread
Dec 14, 2007, 3:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Personality Tests Mr. Personality
Dec 14, 2007, 3:04 pm
RE: RE: Personality Tests Ratemaker
Dec 14, 2007, 1:55 pm
RE: Personality Tests Mr. Personality
Dec 14, 2007, 1:47 pm
Maybe employees should be privy supervisors' personalities? KLS
Dec 14, 2007, 1:46 pm
RE: RE: Personality Tests Jimbo
Dec 14, 2007, 1:30 pm
RE: Personality Tests Mr. Obvious
Dec 14, 2007, 1:28 pm
Personality Tests Rich
Dec 14, 2007, 12:38 pm
Not wanted reject
Dec 14, 2007, 11:57 am
RE: personality tests lastbat
Dec 14, 2007, 10:15 am
personality tests Barry M. Gold CAC CSP
Dec 14, 2007, 9:15 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.