National News
Viewing comments for:
Progressive Receives U.S. Patent for Concierge Claims Service
National News • February 15, 2008
Progressive Insurance reports it has received a U.S. patent for one of its methods of processing vehicle damage claims, which it calls its concierge level of claims service.
With this service, ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Making Chicken Salad from Chicken Poop | rockinhorse | Mar 14, 2008, 1:18 pm |
| RE: Concierge Claim Service | Keith | Feb 23, 2008, 12:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Patent No 7,324,951...... | lastbat | Feb 20, 2008, 10:13 am |
| RE: Patent No 7,324,951...... | Curious Georgette | Feb 20, 2008, 9:51 am |
| RE: Passsenger trains | Stat Guy | Feb 20, 2008, 9:38 am |
| Passsenger trains | curious george | Feb 19, 2008, 12:00 pm |
| RE: Progressive | Stat Guy | Feb 19, 2008, 11:57 am |
| RE: RE: RE: concierge | Rocket Man | Feb 19, 2008, 10:00 am |
| RE: RE: concierge | Scott | Feb 19, 2008, 9:39 am |
| The point again | Big B. | Feb 19, 2008, 9:27 am |
| RE: concierge | blondie | Feb 19, 2008, 9:16 am |
| concierge | wudchuck | Feb 19, 2008, 8:41 am |
| RE: RE: RE: The point | agentsman | Feb 19, 2008, 8:36 am |
| RE: Patents | JGD | Feb 19, 2008, 6:33 am |
| RE: RE: The point | Scott | Feb 18, 2008, 9:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Fad | agentsman | Feb 18, 2008, 4:30 pm |
| RE: The point | SWFL Mark | Feb 18, 2008, 1:38 pm |
| The point | Reason | Feb 18, 2008, 11:01 am |
| RE: Just A Fad | blondie | Feb 18, 2008, 10:55 am |
| RE: Guys, you're missing the point | Fighting Saints | Feb 18, 2008, 10:27 am |
| RE: concierge service | Rocket Man | Feb 16, 2008, 5:34 pm |
| concierge service | wudchuck | Feb 16, 2008, 12:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Anti steering laws | SWFL Mark | Feb 16, 2008, 6:31 am |
| RE: RE: Anti steering laws | concerned | Feb 15, 2008, 4:21 pm |
| RE: RE: A Thought | lastbat | Feb 15, 2008, 4:08 pm |
| RE: A Thought | SP | Feb 15, 2008, 3:55 pm |
| RE: RE: Fad | JJ | Feb 15, 2008, 3:38 pm |
| RE: Fad | claimant | Feb 15, 2008, 3:21 pm |
| RE: Anti steering laws | concerned | Feb 15, 2008, 3:20 pm |
| Just A Fad | Ian | Feb 15, 2008, 2:40 pm |
| Concierge Claim Service | ScottyP | Feb 15, 2008, 2:28 pm |
| RE: Anti steering laws | SWFL Mark | Feb 15, 2008, 2:16 pm |
| A Thought | Eli | Feb 15, 2008, 2:11 pm |
| RE: RE: Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job aga | SP | Feb 15, 2008, 1:21 pm |
| Anti steering laws | Chad Balaamaba | Feb 15, 2008, 1:20 pm |
| RE: Progressive | curious george | Feb 15, 2008, 1:07 pm |
| RE: Guys, you're missing the point | richard dasilva | Feb 15, 2008, 1:05 pm |
| Progressive | Customer | Feb 15, 2008, 1:04 pm |
| RE: Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job again | curious george | Feb 15, 2008, 1:03 pm |
| Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job again | Mighty Joe Young | Feb 15, 2008, 12:56 pm |
| Guys, you're missing the point | Missing the point | Feb 15, 2008, 12:50 pm |
| RE: Patents | curious george | Feb 15, 2008, 12:39 pm |
| Patents | Warren B. | Feb 15, 2008, 11:45 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: Anti steering laws
The customers within my particular company undoubtedly would love this concept, but they wouldn't be satisfied when their Lexus wasn't repaired at a Lexus dealer, Mercedes at Mercedes, etc, etc.
Wonder how the process works when the customer is not satisfied with the repair? There could be some diminished value implications down the road...
Don't get me wrong, this is still a strong idea. Let's see how it works for them.