Home > Talkback
National News

Viewing comments for:

Progressive Receives U.S. Patent for Concierge Claims Service

National News • February 15, 2008
Progressive Insurance reports it has received a U.S. patent for one of its methods of processing vehicle damage claims, which it calls its concierge level of claims service. With this service, ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: Progressive

Posted On: February 19, 2008, 11:57 am CST
Posted By: Stat Guy
Comment:
My agent is an independent who placed me with a regional carrier; I had two auto claims in 15 years....both times, my agent coordinated the whole thing for me (with my permission and without having an agreement to steer my business to any one repair shop)...but the main thing was to get the car to a shop quickly, have it repaired quickly and get my out of my rental a back into my car. From start to finish, it was 10 days for the longest. But I did have to do some of the talking. My agent is the best, in my estimation and I have not given it a thought to "save 15% on my car insurance to switch to GEICO". If this service can be patented, then many carriers must have lousy service.....and Progressive is beating them to the punch. But not my agent!
Subject Posted By Posted On
Making Chicken Salad from Chicken Poop rockinhorse
Mar 14, 2008, 1:18 pm
RE: Concierge Claim Service Keith
Feb 23, 2008, 12:28 pm
RE: RE: Patent No 7,324,951...... lastbat
Feb 20, 2008, 10:13 am
RE: Patent No 7,324,951...... Curious Georgette
Feb 20, 2008, 9:51 am
RE: Passsenger trains Stat Guy
Feb 20, 2008, 9:38 am
Passsenger trains curious george
Feb 19, 2008, 12:00 pm
RE: Progressive Stat Guy
Feb 19, 2008, 11:57 am
RE: RE: RE: concierge Rocket Man
Feb 19, 2008, 10:00 am
RE: RE: concierge Scott
Feb 19, 2008, 9:39 am
The point again Big B.
Feb 19, 2008, 9:27 am
RE: concierge blondie
Feb 19, 2008, 9:16 am
concierge wudchuck
Feb 19, 2008, 8:41 am
RE: RE: RE: The point agentsman
Feb 19, 2008, 8:36 am
RE: Patents JGD
Feb 19, 2008, 6:33 am
RE: RE: The point Scott
Feb 18, 2008, 9:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: Fad agentsman
Feb 18, 2008, 4:30 pm
RE: The point SWFL Mark
Feb 18, 2008, 1:38 pm
The point Reason
Feb 18, 2008, 11:01 am
RE: Just A Fad blondie
Feb 18, 2008, 10:55 am
RE: Guys, you're missing the point Fighting Saints
Feb 18, 2008, 10:27 am
RE: concierge service Rocket Man
Feb 16, 2008, 5:34 pm
concierge service wudchuck
Feb 16, 2008, 12:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Anti steering laws SWFL Mark
Feb 16, 2008, 6:31 am
RE: RE: Anti steering laws concerned
Feb 15, 2008, 4:21 pm
RE: RE: A Thought lastbat
Feb 15, 2008, 4:08 pm
RE: A Thought SP
Feb 15, 2008, 3:55 pm
RE: RE: Fad JJ
Feb 15, 2008, 3:38 pm
RE: Fad claimant
Feb 15, 2008, 3:21 pm
RE: Anti steering laws concerned
Feb 15, 2008, 3:20 pm
Just A Fad Ian
Feb 15, 2008, 2:40 pm
Concierge Claim Service ScottyP
Feb 15, 2008, 2:28 pm
RE: Anti steering laws SWFL Mark
Feb 15, 2008, 2:16 pm
A Thought Eli
Feb 15, 2008, 2:11 pm
RE: RE: Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job aga SP
Feb 15, 2008, 1:21 pm
Anti steering laws Chad Balaamaba
Feb 15, 2008, 1:20 pm
RE: Progressive curious george
Feb 15, 2008, 1:07 pm
RE: Guys, you're missing the point richard dasilva
Feb 15, 2008, 1:05 pm
Progressive Customer
Feb 15, 2008, 1:04 pm
RE: Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job again curious george
Feb 15, 2008, 1:03 pm
Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job again Mighty Joe Young
Feb 15, 2008, 12:56 pm
Guys, you're missing the point Missing the point
Feb 15, 2008, 12:50 pm
RE: Patents curious george
Feb 15, 2008, 12:39 pm
Patents Warren B.
Feb 15, 2008, 11:45 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.