National News

Viewing comments for:

Progressive Receives U.S. Patent for Concierge Claims Service

National News • February 15, 2008
Progressive Insurance reports it has received a U.S. patent for one of its methods of processing vehicle damage claims, which it calls its concierge level of claims service. With this service, ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: Concierge Claim Service

Posted On: February 23, 2008, 12:28 pm CST
Posted By: Keith
Comment:
The program that regressive has patented has been around for years before Progressive was even doing business. Auto body repair shops have provided the same services without the ILLEGAL CONTROL & STEERING that is associated with Progressive & Travelers Concierge Claim Service.
Customers come into my shop.
We set them up with a rental car.
We write an estimate.
Negotiate the repairs with the insurance company.
We repair the vehicle with quality that far exceeds that of regressive body shops, because we control the repair process, not the insurance companies.
When the vehicle is completed, the customer returns the rental, picks up their car, receives a lifetime warranty, and OUR CUSTOMERS LOVE THE SERVICE, THE SPEED, AND THE QUALITY!

Progressive may own the patent, but they will never own my shop or the services we have been providing since the 1950's.
Subject Posted By Posted On
Making Chicken Salad from Chicken Poop rockinhorse
Mar 14, 2008, 1:18 pm
RE: Concierge Claim Service Keith
Feb 23, 2008, 12:28 pm
RE: RE: Patent No 7,324,951...... lastbat
Feb 20, 2008, 10:13 am
RE: Patent No 7,324,951...... Curious Georgette
Feb 20, 2008, 9:51 am
RE: Passsenger trains Stat Guy
Feb 20, 2008, 9:38 am
Passsenger trains curious george
Feb 19, 2008, 12:00 pm
RE: Progressive Stat Guy
Feb 19, 2008, 11:57 am
RE: RE: RE: concierge Rocket Man
Feb 19, 2008, 10:00 am
RE: RE: concierge Scott
Feb 19, 2008, 9:39 am
The point again Big B.
Feb 19, 2008, 9:27 am
RE: concierge blondie
Feb 19, 2008, 9:16 am
concierge wudchuck
Feb 19, 2008, 8:41 am
RE: RE: RE: The point agentsman
Feb 19, 2008, 8:36 am
RE: Patents JGD
Feb 19, 2008, 6:33 am
RE: RE: The point Scott
Feb 18, 2008, 9:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: Fad agentsman
Feb 18, 2008, 4:30 pm
RE: The point SWFL Mark
Feb 18, 2008, 1:38 pm
The point Reason
Feb 18, 2008, 11:01 am
RE: Just A Fad blondie
Feb 18, 2008, 10:55 am
RE: Guys, you're missing the point Fighting Saints
Feb 18, 2008, 10:27 am
RE: concierge service Rocket Man
Feb 16, 2008, 5:34 pm
concierge service wudchuck
Feb 16, 2008, 12:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Anti steering laws SWFL Mark
Feb 16, 2008, 6:31 am
RE: RE: Anti steering laws concerned
Feb 15, 2008, 4:21 pm
RE: RE: A Thought lastbat
Feb 15, 2008, 4:08 pm
RE: A Thought SP
Feb 15, 2008, 3:55 pm
RE: RE: Fad JJ
Feb 15, 2008, 3:38 pm
RE: Fad claimant
Feb 15, 2008, 3:21 pm
RE: Anti steering laws concerned
Feb 15, 2008, 3:20 pm
Just A Fad Ian
Feb 15, 2008, 2:40 pm
Concierge Claim Service ScottyP
Feb 15, 2008, 2:28 pm
RE: Anti steering laws SWFL Mark
Feb 15, 2008, 2:16 pm
A Thought Eli
Feb 15, 2008, 2:11 pm
RE: RE: Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job aga SP
Feb 15, 2008, 1:21 pm
Anti steering laws Chad Balaamaba
Feb 15, 2008, 1:20 pm
RE: Progressive curious george
Feb 15, 2008, 1:07 pm
RE: Guys, you're missing the point richard dasilva
Feb 15, 2008, 1:05 pm
Progressive Customer
Feb 15, 2008, 1:04 pm
RE: Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job again curious george
Feb 15, 2008, 1:03 pm
Patent No 7,324,951......doing the reporters job again Mighty Joe Young
Feb 15, 2008, 12:56 pm
Guys, you're missing the point Missing the point
Feb 15, 2008, 12:50 pm
RE: Patents curious george
Feb 15, 2008, 12:39 pm
Patents Warren B.
Feb 15, 2008, 11:45 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.