National News
Viewing comments for:
Bush Financial Regulation Overhaul Includes Federal Insurance Regulator
National News • March 31, 2008
The Bush administration is proposing a sweeping overhaul of the way the government regulates the nation's financial services industry from banks and securities firms to mortgage brokers and ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Current mess started with appointment Greens | Stat Guy | Apr 2, 2008, 11:07 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Current mess started with appointment Greenspan. | Mark | Apr 1, 2008, 1:26 pm |
| Current mess started with George Bush | Salmon | Apr 1, 2008, 9:18 am |
| RE: RE: Current mess started with appointment Greenspan. | Stat Guy | Apr 1, 2008, 7:17 am |
| RE: The Federal Debate | mike | Mar 31, 2008, 5:12 pm |
| McCarren Ferguson Fiasco | Wiley | Mar 31, 2008, 2:14 pm |
| RE: Current mess started with appointment Greenspan. | anon the mouse | Mar 31, 2008, 2:03 pm |
| RE: RE: McCarren Ferguson fiasco? | Dustin | Mar 31, 2008, 1:46 pm |
| RE: McCarren Ferguson fiasco? | Wiley | Mar 31, 2008, 1:44 pm |
| To: Big Dog | Vlad | Mar 31, 2008, 1:40 pm |
| Keep the Fed out of it or move to Canada :) | Baxtor | Mar 31, 2008, 1:25 pm |
| Mortgage Mess | Simple | Mar 31, 2008, 1:09 pm |
| Non-governmental governance? | Patriot | Mar 31, 2008, 1:04 pm |
| McCarren Ferguson fiasco? | Dustin | Mar 31, 2008, 12:54 pm |
| RE: Insurance Regulation | How come? | Mar 31, 2008, 12:51 pm |
| Insurance Regulation | Wiley | Mar 31, 2008, 12:48 pm |
| RE: To: Big Dog | Big Dog | Mar 31, 2008, 10:33 am |
| To: Big Dog | Vlad | Mar 31, 2008, 10:05 am |
| RE: RE: The Federal Debate | Big Dog | Mar 31, 2008, 9:31 am |
| RE: The Federal Debate | Dustin | Mar 31, 2008, 8:51 am |
| The Federal Debate | CJB | Mar 31, 2008, 8:17 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: McCarren Ferguson fiasco?
At some point we have to ask ourselves is it states rights or are there 50 sets of bureaucrats hanging on to their high paying, great benefit (healthcare etc) jobs.
It is just insurance for goodness sakes, some weather related and other catastrophic issues that the P & C market has to deal with, but why all the layers and layers of bureaucratic stuff adding to our costs?
Sorry, forgot about the lawyers who have to read the 50 different sets of rules plus the admitted vs non admitted rules and regs.
While I am on my box, please, we only need one general set of Workers compensation rules and regs for most workers, you can leave the USL & H and Jones act as it is if you really need two more sets of rules.