National News

Viewing comments for:

Harry Potter Case Illustrates Blurry Line in Copyright Liability

National News • April 21, 2008
For a time, "Harry Potter'' superfan Steven Vander Ark seemed to be living a geeky dream. His Web site — an obsessive catalog of spells, characters and creatures in J.K. Rowling's novels — was a ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: Enid Blyton

Posted On: April 21, 2008, 3:01 pm CDT
Posted By: The Traveler
Comment:
What we're seeing here-and in similar cases-is a reality of the internet age: intellectual property rights are withering. Whether that's good, bad or indifferent is besides the point. Any author or musician who puts something out into the public realm must acknowledge the fact that it can be taken or copied without him/her receiving compensation. For example, how much potential revenue do you think pop/rock stars are losing from fans who download their songs through internet shareware? I'm sure we all sympathize with Metallica's drummer who-due to the internet-can now afford only a 40-room, instead of 53-room mansion. We feel his pain.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Is Rowling the only one affected? Chuck
Apr 22, 2008, 6:27 pm
Is Rowling the only one affected? KLS
Apr 22, 2008, 4:38 pm
RE: Dang muggles Chuck
Apr 21, 2008, 6:51 pm
RE: Dang muggles nancy
Apr 21, 2008, 5:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Enid Blyton andy
Apr 21, 2008, 3:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: Enid Blyton Brianna
Apr 21, 2008, 3:24 pm
RE: RE: Enid Blyton Joey
Apr 21, 2008, 3:08 pm
RE: RE: Enid Blyton The Traveler
Apr 21, 2008, 3:01 pm
RE: Enid Blyton Nobody Important
Apr 21, 2008, 2:23 pm
Enid Blyton Elaine
Apr 21, 2008, 2:07 pm
RE: Dang muggles matt
Apr 21, 2008, 11:57 am
Dang muggles lastbat
Apr 21, 2008, 11:30 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.