National News

Viewing comments for:

CGL Extends Coverage for Injury Arising from Defective Construction

National News • May 28, 2008
Property damage resulting from defective construction is unquestionably excluded in the commercial general liability policy; but what about bodily injury? And is injury or damage caused by the ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Myth that the CGL is not a Warranty or Bond

Posted On: May 28, 2008, 3:41 pm CDT
Posted By: InsuranceGeek
Comment:
The claim that a CGL policy is not a warranty or a bond is largely a myth perpetuated by pundits and courts with disregard to the contract language.

Other than some losses involving the impaired property exclusion, there is nothing in the ISO CGL policy that says it is not a bond or warranty. In fact, "your work" is defined to include warranties:

"Your work":
a. Means:
(1) Work or operations performed by you or on your behalf; and
(2) Materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
b. Includes
(1) Warranties or representations made at any time with respect to the fitness, quality, durability, performance or use of "your work", and
(2) The providing of or failure to provide warnings or instructions.

All that matters is the coverage trigger (mainly BI or PD caused by an occurrence during the policy period) and the exclusions.
Subject Posted By Posted On
CGL policy discussion Calif Ex Pat
May 29, 2008, 7:36 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Case misstated. Ohio $4M was NOT for Sharon Kramer
May 29, 2008, 12:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Case misstated. Ohio $4M was NOT for bod Chris Boggs
May 29, 2008, 12:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Case misstated. Ohio $4M was NOT for bodily Mrs. Kramer
May 29, 2008, 12:12 pm
RE: Link to more on insurance & construction Cindy
May 29, 2008, 11:56 am
Link to more on insurance & construction Cindy
May 29, 2008, 11:54 am
RE: RE: RE: Case misstated. Ohio $4M was NOT for bodily inju Chris Boggs
May 29, 2008, 10:50 am
RE: RE: Case misstated. Ohio $4M was NOT for bodily injury f Mrs. Kramer
May 29, 2008, 9:57 am
RE: Case misstated. Ohio $4M was NOT for bodily injury from Chris Boggs
May 29, 2008, 7:27 am
Case misstated. Ohio $4M was NOT for bodily injury from mold Mrs. Kramer
May 28, 2008, 9:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Myth that the CGL is not a Warranty or Bond CSTE
May 28, 2008, 7:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: Myth that the CGL is not a Warranty or Bond InsIsMyPassion
May 28, 2008, 7:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: Myth that the CGL is not a Warranty or Bond Cindy
May 28, 2008, 6:18 pm
RE: RE: Myth that the CGL is not a Warranty or Bond JLP
May 28, 2008, 4:56 pm
RE: Myth that the CGL is not a Warranty or Bond InsIsMyPassion
May 28, 2008, 3:49 pm
Myth that the CGL is not a Warranty or Bond InsuranceGeek
May 28, 2008, 3:41 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.