National News
Viewing comments for:
Mortgage Rescission Could Be Class Action Nightmare for U.S. Banks
National News July 7, 2008
A lawsuit filed by a Wisconsin couple against their mortgage lender could have major implications for banks should a U.S. appeals court agree that borrowers can cancel their loans en masse when ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: how did this happen..... | Gill Fin | Jul 8, 2008, 11:43 pm |
| how did this happen..... | MBB | Jul 8, 2008, 12:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They don't need to rescind | David | Jul 8, 2008, 12:26 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: They don't need to rescind | Tina | Jul 8, 2008, 9:23 am |
| RE: The whole dang ship needs to go down... | Just a thought | Jul 8, 2008, 8:22 am |
| The whole dang ship needs to go down... | Terrie B | Jul 7, 2008, 9:28 pm |
| Class Action? | Johnny | Jul 7, 2008, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: They don't need to rescind | caveat emptor | Jul 7, 2008, 3:18 pm |
| Wait a minute... | Tom | Jul 7, 2008, 2:55 pm |
| RE: RE: I Agree with Dawn- that's the worst part. | Dawn | Jul 7, 2008, 1:54 pm |
| RE: I Agree with Dawn | Disheartened | Jul 7, 2008, 1:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: They don't need to rescind | Dawn | Jul 7, 2008, 1:43 pm |
| RE: RE: They don't need to rescind | caveat emptor | Jul 7, 2008, 1:32 pm |
| RE: They don't need to rescind | Dawn | Jul 7, 2008, 1:16 pm |
| Mortgage | Sam | Jul 7, 2008, 12:56 pm |
| RE: They don't need to rescind | DDay | Jul 7, 2008, 11:53 am |
| They don't need to rescind | lastbat | Jul 7, 2008, 11:06 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: They don't need to rescind
There are a lot of elderly people who refinanced what little they had left in their mortgage to a 'lower payment' that ballooned up in a year. PLUS an early payment penalty that made it impossible for them to refinance.
People who qualified for standared loans were bascially pushed into these subprime because it paid the brokers better. The brokers told these buyers that these loans were all that was available to them.
These people were convinced by an expert (who should be held accountable) that this was the best move for them.
You're an expert. If you talked a homeowner into cancelling an HO policy to move them to a more expensive policy that paid less benefits because your commission was higher, who's E&O insurance would be paying out?
Not everyone caught in an ARM is an $8 an hour worker trying to buy a $500K home.