National News

Viewing comments for:

Insurance Agents, Travelers, Nationwide Urge Coastal Wind Policy

National News • July 16, 2008
Travelers, Nationwide Mutual and two leading national insurance producer organizations are supporting a plan they say will make private windstorm insurance more affordable and available in coastal ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: Re: Curious

Posted On: July 16, 2008, 9:13 pm CDT
Posted By: Chuck
Comment:
I'm sorry but your position with respects to the govt subsidy for coastal states is pretty weak. The flood program the govt has in place is a disaster. After Katrinta, the program ran a $ 17 BILLION deficit. So basically, you want the rest of the country to send their tax dollars to the coastal states so they can rest easy that they are insured for wind. You and I both know the rates would NEVER be enough to cover the losses (as they are now). This is why you see the big players in personal lines whining about a national program. The big companies want it both ways. They want to do business in those states without the risk of paying out big after THE BIG ONE. And I wonder where you live? I am not paying my tax dollars for the perils that coastal state homeowners may endure.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Reply to Dawn Dawn
Jul 21, 2008, 9:02 am
Re: reply to an interested party Blue Bird
Jul 21, 2008, 8:24 am
Reply to Dawn An Interested Party
Jul 18, 2008, 4:32 pm
RE: Federal Windstorm Program Dawn
Jul 18, 2008, 1:11 pm
Federal Windstorm Program An Interested Party
Jul 18, 2008, 12:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 18, 2008, 7:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Chuck
Jul 17, 2008, 9:12 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 17, 2008, 2:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 17, 2008, 2:28 pm
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Andrew
Jul 17, 2008, 1:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Jon the Agent
Jul 17, 2008, 12:19 pm
Travelers Coastal Program An Interested Party
Jul 17, 2008, 12:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Desert Dweller
Jul 17, 2008, 12:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 17, 2008, 9:18 am
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Iowaboy
Jul 17, 2008, 8:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Sales Guy
Jul 17, 2008, 7:29 am
RE: Re: Curious Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 9:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 9:04 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Ken
Jul 16, 2008, 5:43 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Andrew
Jul 16, 2008, 4:28 pm
RE: Re: Curious Anon
Jul 16, 2008, 3:16 pm
Re: Curious Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 2:18 pm
RIGHT....... Chip
Jul 16, 2008, 2:15 pm
Welfare vs Insurance
Jul 16, 2008, 2:14 pm
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Curious
Jul 16, 2008, 2:02 pm
A Solution is Needed Mongoose
Jul 16, 2008, 1:44 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 1:24 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates
Jul 16, 2008, 1:19 pm
Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 1:16 pm
RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Ellen
Jul 16, 2008, 12:52 pm
RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout John
Jul 16, 2008, 12:48 pm
RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Ellen
Jul 16, 2008, 12:45 pm
Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 12:30 pm
Commercial risks Buck
Jul 16, 2008, 12:29 pm
Commercial Mark
Jul 16, 2008, 11:34 am
2 missing elements John
Jul 16, 2008, 6:13 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.