National News

Viewing comments for:

Insurance Agents, Travelers, Nationwide Urge Coastal Wind Policy

National News • July 16, 2008
Travelers, Nationwide Mutual and two leading national insurance producer organizations are supporting a plan they say will make private windstorm insurance more affordable and available in coastal ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates

Posted On: July 17, 2008, 2:28 pm CDT
Posted By: Dawn
Comment:
How do you determine the risk? Memphis had more (and stronger) tornados this year then ever before.

Arizona had earthquakes- Reno even had earthquakes. Not much of a history of that.

The entire world has seen more disasters on broader scales then ever before in the last few years.

I'm not being argumentative. Just asking.

My honest opinion is that Federal Funds should be used for our own people and cities before it's sent abroad. I know a lot of people on this board don't want to help the flood victims, or hurricane victims, or any other natural disaster victims in our country. BUT- we do end up paying in one way or other.

The Cummings Factory flooded. Parts are now more expensive and out of stock all over the country for heavy equipment and diesel engines. I'd rather see the Feds help get them up and running as quickly as possible so the 50 or so industries that depend on them stay solvent. Cost us all a lot less in the long run.

No matter what happens, we're all going to pay. Either share the risk of insurance, share the cost of rebuilding, or absorb the cost to the economy.

I'm just saying that sharing the cost of insurance would be cheapest way to go for the average person.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Reply to Dawn Dawn
Jul 21, 2008, 9:02 am
Re: reply to an interested party Blue Bird
Jul 21, 2008, 8:24 am
Reply to Dawn An Interested Party
Jul 18, 2008, 4:32 pm
RE: Federal Windstorm Program Dawn
Jul 18, 2008, 1:11 pm
Federal Windstorm Program An Interested Party
Jul 18, 2008, 12:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 18, 2008, 7:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Chuck
Jul 17, 2008, 9:12 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 17, 2008, 2:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 17, 2008, 2:28 pm
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Andrew
Jul 17, 2008, 1:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Jon the Agent
Jul 17, 2008, 12:19 pm
Travelers Coastal Program An Interested Party
Jul 17, 2008, 12:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Desert Dweller
Jul 17, 2008, 12:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 17, 2008, 9:18 am
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Iowaboy
Jul 17, 2008, 8:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Sales Guy
Jul 17, 2008, 7:29 am
RE: Re: Curious Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 9:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 9:04 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Ken
Jul 16, 2008, 5:43 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Andrew
Jul 16, 2008, 4:28 pm
RE: Re: Curious Anon
Jul 16, 2008, 3:16 pm
Re: Curious Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 2:18 pm
RIGHT....... Chip
Jul 16, 2008, 2:15 pm
Welfare vs Insurance
Jul 16, 2008, 2:14 pm
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Curious
Jul 16, 2008, 2:02 pm
A Solution is Needed Mongoose
Jul 16, 2008, 1:44 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 1:24 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates
Jul 16, 2008, 1:19 pm
Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 1:16 pm
RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Ellen
Jul 16, 2008, 12:52 pm
RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout John
Jul 16, 2008, 12:48 pm
RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Ellen
Jul 16, 2008, 12:45 pm
Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 12:30 pm
Commercial risks Buck
Jul 16, 2008, 12:29 pm
Commercial Mark
Jul 16, 2008, 11:34 am
2 missing elements John
Jul 16, 2008, 6:13 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.