National News

Viewing comments for:

Insurance Agents, Travelers, Nationwide Urge Coastal Wind Policy

National News • July 16, 2008
Travelers, Nationwide Mutual and two leading national insurance producer organizations are supporting a plan they say will make private windstorm insurance more affordable and available in coastal ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates

Posted On: July 18, 2008, 7:54 am CDT
Posted By: Dawn
Comment:
It was just what I said. Yes, Cummings will get their factory up and running, hopefully. (with the economy in the condition it's in, who really knows) The point is that the economy is effected by these disasters in one way or another. It's a snowball effect.

Look at La after Katrina. Yes, I've heard all the arguements that the people there should have had insurance, they should have left, they should have done a thousand things to avoid the situation they ended up in. But they didn't. So, we, the taxpayers, foot the bill. Would have been cheaper in the long run to subsidize their flood insurance and rebuild then to just hand out money, trailers, transportation as we have done for the last 2 years.

(Would have been a lot cheaper to just fix the levees in the first place, but since our infrastructure is the last place anyone wants to spend money the bridges collapse and the levees fail all over the country)

A federal disaster plan is the best our gov't can come up with. Not saying much, I know. But I'd rather see subsidized premiums with a sound reinsurance plan then billions spent on 'handouts' after the fact. Structured correctly, it would save millions in the long run. Millions we have to pay as taxpayers.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Reply to Dawn Dawn
Jul 21, 2008, 9:02 am
Re: reply to an interested party Blue Bird
Jul 21, 2008, 8:24 am
Reply to Dawn An Interested Party
Jul 18, 2008, 4:32 pm
RE: Federal Windstorm Program Dawn
Jul 18, 2008, 1:11 pm
Federal Windstorm Program An Interested Party
Jul 18, 2008, 12:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 18, 2008, 7:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Chuck
Jul 17, 2008, 9:12 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 17, 2008, 2:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 17, 2008, 2:28 pm
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Andrew
Jul 17, 2008, 1:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Jon the Agent
Jul 17, 2008, 12:19 pm
Travelers Coastal Program An Interested Party
Jul 17, 2008, 12:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Desert Dweller
Jul 17, 2008, 12:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Dawn
Jul 17, 2008, 9:18 am
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Iowaboy
Jul 17, 2008, 8:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Sales Guy
Jul 17, 2008, 7:29 am
RE: Re: Curious Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 9:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 9:04 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Ken
Jul 16, 2008, 5:43 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Andrew
Jul 16, 2008, 4:28 pm
RE: Re: Curious Anon
Jul 16, 2008, 3:16 pm
Re: Curious Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 2:18 pm
RIGHT....... Chip
Jul 16, 2008, 2:15 pm
Welfare vs Insurance
Jul 16, 2008, 2:14 pm
RE: RE: Actuarially sound rates Curious
Jul 16, 2008, 2:02 pm
A Solution is Needed Mongoose
Jul 16, 2008, 1:44 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 1:24 pm
RE: Actuarially sound rates
Jul 16, 2008, 1:19 pm
Actuarially sound rates Peony
Jul 16, 2008, 1:16 pm
RE: RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Ellen
Jul 16, 2008, 12:52 pm
RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout John
Jul 16, 2008, 12:48 pm
RE: Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Ellen
Jul 16, 2008, 12:45 pm
Nothing more than a taxpayer bailout Chuck
Jul 16, 2008, 12:30 pm
Commercial risks Buck
Jul 16, 2008, 12:29 pm
Commercial Mark
Jul 16, 2008, 11:34 am
2 missing elements John
Jul 16, 2008, 6:13 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.