National News
Viewing comments for:
Senate Banking Committee Urged to Back Federal Insurance Regulation
National News July 30, 2008
The U.S. regulatory structure for the insurance industry puts companies at a disadvantage overseas and stifles innovation and competition for consumers, the industry told U.S. lawmakers ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: Federal (non) Oversight | Rusty | Aug 5, 2008, 10:12 am |
| RE: RE: Federal (non) Oversight | Ratemaker | Jul 31, 2008, 12:02 pm |
| Innovation from weaker regulation | MAP in A2 | Jul 31, 2008, 8:31 am |
| RE: Federal (non) Oversight | matt | Jul 31, 2008, 8:15 am |
| Federal (non) Oversight | Joe B | Jul 30, 2008, 3:49 pm |
| FEDERAL INSURANCE REGULATION | J D Kull | Jul 30, 2008, 3:48 pm |
| you guys are wrong | Jul 30, 2008, 1:31 pm |
|
| RE: The more I learn about this... | CBC | Jul 30, 2008, 1:06 pm |
| The more I learn about this... | KLS | Jul 30, 2008, 12:35 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: FEDERAL INSURANCE REGULATION
And look at that how that has made the banking industry so successful!
Whether it is the Feds or state regulators, the least regulation should not mean ineffective regulation. BFannie Mae and Freddie Mac were very effective at keeping the regulators away and the American taxpayers will pay for it.