National News
Viewing comments for:
States Should Raise Driving Age, Says Insurance Safety Group
National News September 10, 2008
Taking aim at a longstanding rite of passage for 16-year-olds, an influential auto safety group is calling on states to raise the age for getting a driver's license to 17 or even 18.
Adrian Lund, ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: TEENS | Shield | Sep 11, 2008, 2:35 pm |
| To "Mike" & "Learn Responsibility" | SFOInsuranceLady | Sep 11, 2008, 2:04 pm |
| RE: TEENS | cheli | Sep 11, 2008, 1:48 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | Mark | Sep 11, 2008, 12:23 pm |
| I say NJ stats suggest otherwise | Reality Check | Sep 11, 2008, 11:51 am |
| RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | the old man | Sep 11, 2008, 9:43 am |
| driving is a right? | Stat Guy | Sep 11, 2008, 9:42 am |
| RE: wudchuck | Stat Guy | Sep 11, 2008, 9:30 am |
| RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | RS | Sep 11, 2008, 9:29 am |
| RE: RE: TEENS | Stat Guy | Sep 11, 2008, 9:20 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | Dread | Sep 11, 2008, 7:28 am |
| RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | Its about consequences | Sep 10, 2008, 6:37 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | SFL | Sep 10, 2008, 4:58 pm |
| RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | Learn Responsibility | Sep 10, 2008, 4:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | wudchuck | Sep 10, 2008, 4:46 pm |
| RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | Learn Responsibility | Sep 10, 2008, 4:36 pm |
| RE: RE: 18 | SFOInsuranceLady | Sep 10, 2008, 3:58 pm |
| RE: 18 | SFOInsuranceLady | Sep 10, 2008, 3:55 pm |
| RE: RE: 18 | GMJ | Sep 10, 2008, 3:50 pm |
| RE: 18 | wudchuck | Sep 10, 2008, 3:45 pm |
| Graduated licensing | Interested mother | Sep 10, 2008, 3:40 pm |
| 18 | RS | Sep 10, 2008, 3:21 pm |
| RE: 18 | SFOInsuranceLady | Sep 10, 2008, 3:04 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | AFranks | Sep 10, 2008, 2:27 pm |
| RE: RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | chuck lutes | Sep 10, 2008, 2:10 pm |
| 18 | Rocket Scientist | Sep 10, 2008, 2:01 pm |
| RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | SFL | Sep 10, 2008, 1:57 pm |
| RE: Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | AFranks | Sep 10, 2008, 1:48 pm |
| Lazy and Uninvolved Parents | SFOInsuranceLady | Sep 10, 2008, 1:30 pm |
| wudchuck | AFranks | Sep 10, 2008, 1:12 pm |
| RE: Questionable Data | Careful | Sep 10, 2008, 1:04 pm |
| RE: former teen, wudchuck and Mr obvious...wake up | SP | Sep 10, 2008, 12:57 pm |
| RE: RE: Graduated drivers licensing | wudchuck | Sep 10, 2008, 12:57 pm |
| former teen, wudchuck and Mr obvious...wake up | Baxtor | Sep 10, 2008, 12:49 pm |
| RE: Graduated drivers licensing | Compman | Sep 10, 2008, 12:49 pm |
| Graduated drivers licensing | Mr. Obvious | Sep 10, 2008, 12:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: TEENS | wudchuck | Sep 10, 2008, 11:22 am |
| RE: RE: TEENS | wudchuck | Sep 10, 2008, 10:53 am |
| RE: RE: TEENS | imateen | Sep 10, 2008, 10:38 am |
| Questionable Data | InsIsMyPassion | Sep 10, 2008, 10:35 am |
| RE: TEENS | former teen | Sep 10, 2008, 10:21 am |
| TEENS | wudchuck | Sep 10, 2008, 9:45 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: I say NJ stats suggest otherwise
First of all, the stats were from a study done in the 1990's. Cell phones and especially texting were less common back then so I question using those results to justify actions in 2008.
Secondly, if NJ doesn't permit 16 year-olds to drive, then the number of 16 & 17 year-olds on the road should be 1/2 of that in Connecticut. Therefore, NJ deaths of 16 & 17 year-old drivers should be 1/2 or less than the Connecticut rate. Well, well, Connecticut's rate was 26 while NJ's was more than 1/2 that at 16. Using this stat alone, 16 year-olds should be able to drive.
One other thing - should kids learn to drink (legally) before they can drive or after they have learned to drive? I'll pick after every time.