National News
Viewing comments for:
The Era of Re-Regulation is Upon Us
National News October 20, 2008
Although the nation's attention is focused on the financial crisis it is worth thinking about how this mess will affect attitudes toward government intervention.
The July issue of The Atlantic ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re-regulation | milo | Oct 21, 2008, 1:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re-regulation | an interested party | Oct 21, 2008, 11:35 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re-regulation | milo | Oct 21, 2008, 6:25 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Re-regulation | Jerry | Oct 20, 2008, 6:55 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Re-regulation | H Reid | Oct 20, 2008, 4:33 pm |
| RE: RE: Re-regulation | Jerry | Oct 20, 2008, 4:02 pm |
| RE: Re-regulation | Dread | Oct 20, 2008, 2:49 pm |
| Re-regulation | Jerry | Oct 20, 2008, 11:16 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Re-regulation
Regardless of the cause of the wholesale sector failure, the simple fact remains that US taxpayers now own majority stakes in AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and probably soon several major banks. My current belief is that the market failure resulted from shifting regulatory guidance and efforts.
Whenever, regulators shift the basis or content of their regulations and change the regulatory perception to industry participants, a vacuum is established. The vacuum causes the industry and individuals to adjust their behavior. Some of this behavior adjustment results in less than desirable outcomes.
Whenever the paradigm of an industry is shifted, there are benefits and costs. This benefits and costs need to evaluated from a societal point of reference. Obviously, the costs from the current system of the Fed Reserve and SEC is perceived to be greater than the benefits derived from it.